PSYC1004 Study Guide - Final Guide: Classical Conditioning, Ethology, Operant Conditioning

37 views4 pages
17 May 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Behaviourism and Social-Cognitive Theories
Social-Cognitive Theories
Developed by academic psychologists.
Attempt to obtain strong empirical support.
Origin: behaviourism
Influences: cognitive and social psychology
Behaviourism
"Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up and I'll
guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select" eg:
doctor, lawyer, artist, etc.
Started in early 20th century
Watson and Skinner
The main proposition - psychologists need to focus on observable behaviour and disregard non-
observable, subjective psychological factors (the mind, thoughts, cognitions, feelings, awareness the
unconscious).
The cause of human (and animal) behaviour is entirely external (in the environment).
A strong empirical traditions:
o Rigorous methods.
o There is a strong focus on what can be observed and controlled.
Much research: Animal behaviour - but the findings have often been generalised to humans.
Personality is a fiction
o Behaviour is learned or unlearned.
o There is no internal personality structure that can be scientifically investigated.
Every person is an empty organism.
Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov discovered the phenomenon in the late 19th century.
1. Neutral stimulus no response
2. Neutral stimulus + unconditioned stimulus unconditioned response
3. Conditioned stimulus conditioned response
Eg: Dogs conditioned to produce saliva from a stimulus that was related to feeding, eg: a ticker or bell.
John Watson
The founder of behaviourism.
Highly critical of the introspection methods in psychology - unreliable and unmeasurable.
S-R Model
Conditioning is automatic/not subject to the control of the will.
Internal mental processes do not mediate nor cause behavioural responses.
Animals and humans - highly malleable, conditioning can instil any kind of behaviour.
An experiment with little Albert:
1. Neutral stimulus (rat) no response
2. Neutral stimulus (rat) + unconditioned stimulus (loud sound) unconditioned response (fear)
3. Conditioned stimulus (rat) conditioned response (fear)
Watson argued that learning shapes individual differences.
o Individual differences are due to individuals having different (unique) learning histories.
o S-R patterns - individuals learned through past conditioning (in a unique way) how to respond
to different stimuli.
o Individuals can be changed through conditioning.
Skinner's Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning - the organism "operates" on the environment and produces consequences.
Classical conditioning: Stimulus Response
Operant conditioning: Response Stimulus
External (environmental) contingencies influence behaviour.
Response occurs before the stimulus but the stimulus will determine if the response is to increase or
decrease in frequency.
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 4 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Social-cognitive theories: developed by academic psychologists, attempt to obtain strong empirical support, origin: behaviourism. Started in early 20th century: watson and skinner. The main proposition - psychologists need to focus on observable behaviour and disregard non- observable, subjective psychological factors (the mind, thoughts, cognitions, feelings, awareness the unconscious). Personality is a fiction: behaviour is learned or unlearned, there is no internal personality structure that can be scientifically investigated. Ivan pavlov discovered the phenomenon in the late 19th century: neutral stimulus no response, neutral stimulus + unconditioned stimulus unconditioned response, conditioned stimulus conditioned response. Eg: dogs conditioned to produce saliva from a stimulus that was related to feeding, eg: a ticker or bell. The founder of behaviourism: highly critical of the introspection methods in psychology - unreliable and unmeasurable, animals and humans - highly malleable, conditioning can instil any kind of behaviour, an experiment with little albert: Conditioning is automatic/not subject to the control of the will.