MULT30018 Study Guide - Final Guide: Natural Experiment, Interrupted Time Series, Linear Regression

140 views8 pages

olivecaribou938

30 Jul 2018

School

University of Melbourne

Department

MULT

Course

MULT30018

Professor

All

For unlimited access to Study Guides, a Grade+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Steps in quantitative research process: select topic, focus question, design study, collect data, analyze data, interpret data, inform others. A report based on sampling must use a representative sample in order to be worth much, which is one from which every source of bias has been removed. The dependability of a sample can be destroyed just as easily by invisible sources of bias as by the visible ones. If you can"t find a source of demonstrable bias, allow yourself some degree of skepticism about the results as long as there is a possibility of bias somewhere. Stratified random sampling is a more economical substitute that is almost universally used in such fields as opinion polling and market research. To get this stratified sample, you divide your universe into several groups in proportion to their known prevalence. However, your information about their proportion may not be correct. Scientific methods of data collection are new.

Related Questions

Could you please fill this out for Postpartum depression:

Directions

Write a research proposal using your clinical question formulated earlier in the course that was approved by your instructor. This may be either a qualitative or quantitative research proposal. Your proposal must include APA formatting. The proposal should be a 6â10 in length plus appendices cover page, and reference page. The appendices should include your survey instrument created in week 6. (week 7)

As you are writing your paper, use the below as your guideline. Make sure you use APA format for all aspects of the paper.

Introduction

â¢ Clearly stated problem and purpose of the study

â¢ Independent and dependent variables

â¢ Definition of terms

â¢ Assumptions, hypothesis, or questions (depending on research type)

Theoretical Framework

â¢ Description of the theoretical framework to be utilized

â¢ Identification of the concepts to be explored

â¢ Rationale for choosing framework

Review of the literature

â¢ At least 4 scholarly sources included

â¢ Appropriateness of the review and the proposal focus

â¢ Inclusion of primary or secondary sources

Methodology

â¢ Description of study type (quantitative or qualitative)

â¢ Description of study design

â¢ Rationale for the use of the selected design

â¢ Inclusion of sample size, type, sampling method, inclusion/exclusion criteria, setting, data collection method (instrument), and data collection process

â¢ Method for Protection of Human Subjects (consent)

â¢ Questionnaire and consent forms must be included as appendices

Data Analysis

â¢ Data analysis method is appropriate for study design.

â¢ Method of data analysis is clearly stated. â¢ Method for displaying findings is stated.

Applicability to Nursing

â¢ Research focuses on a problem significant to nursing.

â¢ Research would contribute to nursing knowledge.

â¢ Proposal is complete so that another researcher could replicate the study. â¢ Statement about areas of nursing that would benefit from this study.

Research Proposal: Does the mother's cultural background impact potential postpartum depression?

(A Retrospective of LA County)

silverarmadillo533

QUESTION 1What is the purpose of post hoc tests? Under what circumstances are post hoc tests not needed or appropriate?

a. Under what circumstances is ANOVA a more appropriate statistical technique to use than a t test for independent samples? Please provide an example(s) to support your answer. (2 marks)

b. (2 marks)

c. In testing the difference between group means, how are between group and within group variability related to each other? Provide an example to support your answer. (2 marks)

QUESTION 2

a. If a two-factor ANOVA results in a significant main effect for factor A and a significant AxB interaction, explain why you should be cautious in interpreting the effect of factor A. (1 mark)

b. For the following research situations what would be your main effects and interaction effect. If there was a significant interaction effect what would that mean? (please be as clear as possible in your explanation):

A researcher hypothesizes that the effect of alcohol consumption on one’s motor skills depends on the person’s weight (underweight, normal, overweight), but that this may differ for men versus women. (2 marks)
A teacher is interested in seeing how attending class and reading the assigned chapters is related to her students’ performance on tests. She assesses each student in terms of how often they attend class (rarely, sometimes, regularly) and how often they read the assigned chapters (rarely, sometimes, regularly). (2 marks)

QUESTION 3

Ethel is interested in two methods of note-taking strategies and the effect of these strategies on the overall GPAs of college freshmen. She believes that men would benefit most from Method 1, while women would benefit most from Method 2. After obtaining 30 men and 30 women volunteers in freshmen orientation, she randomly assigns 10 men and 10 women to Method 1, 10 men and 10 women to Method 2, and 10 men and 10 women to a control condition. During the first month of the spring semester individuals in the two note-taking method groups receive daily instruction on the particular note-taking method to which they were assigned. The control group receives no note-taking instruction. Fall and spring GPAs for all participants are recorded and a score that is the difference between the spring and fall semester GPAs is calculated.

Below are the results from running a two-way ANOVA. Please answer the following:

What is the dependent variable? (0.5 marks)
What are the independent variables (factors)? (0.5 marks)
What is the research question(s) being addressed? (1 mark)
What does the descriptive statistics (graphical) tell us about the effects under study?

(1 mark)
What assumptions are being tested in the R output? Are these assumptions met? Please

provide statistical evidence. (2 marks)
What effects are being tested in the R output? (1 mark)
What does output from the ANOVA table tell us? (1 mark)
What type of follow-up analyses was conducted and why? Please interpret. (2 marks)

: Men
: Method1

      median
coef.var

0.300

0.469

: Women
: Method1

      median
coef.var

0.150

0.496

: Men
: Method2

      median
coef.var

0.275

0.027

: Women
: Method2

      median
coef.var

0.600

0.629

: Men
: Control

      median
coef.var

0.175

mean 0.335

mean 0.170

mean 0.305

mean 0.640

mean 0.165

mean 0.105

skew.2SE
   0.408

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

var 0.052

var 0.033

var 0.037

var 0.032

var 0.022

var 0.021

normtest.W
     0.936

std.dev
  0.229

0.682
    skewness

1.076
    skewness

0.630
    skewness

0.072

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

normtest.p 0.830 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

skew.2SE
   0.342

kurtosis
  -0.645

kurt.2SE
  -0.242

normtest.W
     0.964

0.058

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

std.dev
  0.183

normtest.p 0.096 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

skew.2SE
   0.361

kurtosis
  -1.363

kurt.2SE
  -0.511

normtest.W
     0.869

0.061

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

std.dev
  0.192

normtest.p 0.857 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

0.278
    skewness

0.904
    skewness

skew.2SE
  -0.124

kurtosis
  -1.096

kurt.2SE
  -0.411

normtest.W
     0.979

-0.171

: Women
: Control

      median
coef.var

0.100

1.392
    skewness

0.560

0.046

kurtosis
  -0.759

0.105

kurt.2SE
  -0.284

   std.dev
     0.146

normtest.p
     0.512

skew.2SE
   0.019

kurtosis
  -1.443

kurt.2SE
  -0.541

normtest.W
     0.967

skew.2SE
   0.458

kurtosis
  -0.770

kurt.2SE
  -0.289

normtest.W
     0.906

0.056

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

std.dev
  0.178

normtest.p 0.254 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      std.dev
                                                                        0.149

normtest.p 0.958 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

0.047

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

0.164

0.131

0.137

0.127

0.107

> leveneTest(gpa$gpaimpr~gpa$gender, data=gpa,center=mean)

Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = mean) Df F value Pr(>F)

group 1 7.09 0.01* 58

---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > leveneTest(gpa$gpaimpr~method, data=gpa,center=mean) Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = mean)

      Df F value Pr(>F)
group  2    1.94   0.15

> #running Levene's test for assumption of HOV (INTERACTION EFFECT)
> leveneTest(gpa$gpaimpr, interaction(gpa$gender,gpa$method),center=mean) Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = mean)

      Df F value Pr(>F)
group  5    0.57   0.72

Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) gender 1 0.020 0.020 0.61 0.43753

method 2 1.174 0.587 17.81 1.1e-06 *** gender:method 2 0.695 0.348 10.54 0.00014 *** Residuals 54 1.780 0.033
---

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

gender        0.0055
method        0.3200
gender:method 0.1894

0.011
0.397
0.281

eta.sq eta.sq.part

#selecting only Method1, run ANOVA, then follow-up tests

  Tukey multiple comparisons of means
    95% family-wise confidence level

Fit: aov(formula = gpaimpr ~ gender, data = gpaMethod1)
$`gender`
Women-Men -0.165 -0.3594851  0.02948506    0.0915581

diff        lwr        upr     p adj

#selecting only Method2, run ANOVA, then follow-up tests

  Tukey multiple comparisons of means
    95% family-wise confidence level

Fit: aov(formula = gpaimpr ~ gender, data = gpaMethod2)
$`gender`
Women-Men 0.335 0.161153 0.508847   0.000754

diff      lwr      upr    p adj

aquamarineox434

MULT30018 Study Guide - Final Guide: Natural Experiment, Interrupted Time Series, Linear Regression

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

SOC100H5 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Sampling Bias, Participant Observation, Dependent And Independent Variables

COMM 2002 Study Guide - Final Guide: Null Hypothesis, Skewness, Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research

SOC 1101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Grounded Theory, Unstructured Interview, Laud Humphreys

Related Questions