PSYC1111 Study Guide - Final Guide: Schizophrenia, Sexual Dysfunction, Internal Validity

20 views5 pages
28 May 2018
Department
Course
Professor
Validity
The two most important forms of validity
o Internal validity (strength of the causal explanation between two variables)
always about causation
o External Validity (population and ecological validity) can you make this
important for general population and outside of the lab
Threats to validity: Factors that lower validity
Threats to validity
A threat to internal validity = Confound
o Confound = something that undermines an explanation
A threat to external validity = Artifact
o Artifact = a by-product of a testing procedure or sample that biases all the
results
o Because of the way you are testing it
Confound
Confound is a third variable that differs between the groups
Confounds influence the DV and are not the variable you are
manipulating
You may have a different confound in your experimental and
control groups
Artifact
An artefact is present consistently in all groups and measures
Artifacts reduce external validity
Prevents you generalising your results
i.e. being observed
Threats to Internal Validity
Internal validity
J. “. Mill’s 3 riteria to ifer ausatio
1. Covariation There is a relationship
2. Temporal sequence a’t ake ausal lai uless oe thig ourred first
3. Eliminate alternative explanations
Third variable problem
Confounds Extraneous variable that systematically varies or influences both the
independent and the dependent variable
Third Variable Problem: Confound
There is a positive correlation between coffee drinking and the likelihood of having a
heart attack
o Can we conclude that drinking coffee causes heart attacks?
o People that are smokers tend to drink more coffee
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
o May be increased job stress
o May have poor sleep
Oxygen causes rust
We breath oxygen
Therefore, oxygen will damage our lungs
Obviously wrong
Third variables
o Need water
o Need iron or steel
o It is actually the interaction between irons, water and oxygen that produces
rust (iron oxide)
The best way to account for these systematic confounds is usually to manipulate the
independent variable
Pseudo eperiets / false eperiets ost suseptile
o Exposure to the variable of interest
o Effect of the variable of interest
o No comparison or control
o E.g. power balance wrist bands
Importance of control groups
Control Groups
Variable manipulation
You want to manipulate only the variable of interest between groups/conditions
Challenge is to keep everything else constant
Threat To Internal Validity: Confounds
Where do they come from?
From the experimenter
From the participants individual differences
Major threats to internal validity:
o The validity of a statement about the causal relationship between variables
Confounds: From the Experimenter I
Experimenter bias
Maze dull and bright rats
Told the rats were bright or dull
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Validity: the two most important forms of validity. Confound: confound is a third variable that differs between the groups, confounds influence the dv and are not the variable you are manipulating, you may have a different confound in your experimental and control groups. Artifact: an artefact is present consistently in all groups and measures, artifacts reduce external validity, prevents you generalising your results i. e. being observed. Control groups: variable manipulation, you want to manipulate only the variable of interest between groups/conditions, challenge is to keep everything else constant. Threat to internal validity: confounds: where do they come from, from the experimenter, from the participants individual differences, major threats to internal validity, the validity of a statement about the causal relationship between variables. Confounds: from the experimenter i: experimenter bias, maze dull and bright rats, told the rats were bright or dull, the rats performed differently on the maze, no difference between the rats, experimented is influencing the outcome.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents