6594 Study Guide - Final Guide: Puffery, Gijsbert Van Tienhoven, Metropolitan Railway

• School: University of Canberra
• Department: University of Canberra
• Course: 6594
• Professor: All

Document Summary

Part v division 2: 14 - 15. Part v div 1: 18 19. Unconscionable conduct s51aa, s51ab, s51ac: 20 - 21. Was an offer made: depends on offeror"s intention to be bound by any potential acceptance. Fisher v bell (invitation to treat: the display of an item in a shop window with the price attached is not an offer to sell, but merely an invitation to treat. Partridge v crittenden (invitation to treat: an advertisement is an invitation to treat, because there is no definite declaration by the offeror that it will be honoured upon acceptance. If it is an offer, then there may be more acceptors than can be supplied shopkeeper forced to breach some contracts absurdity cannot be an offer. Harris v nickerson (auction: advertising an auction is not an offer, but a statement of present intention. Harvey v facey (offer or inquiry?: an offer must be differentiated from an enquiry.