[LAWS 2301] - Midterm Exam Guide - Ultimate 29 pages long Study Guide!

158 views29 pages

Document Summary

Jane doe v. metropolitan toronto commissioner of police. Failure of police to warn potential victims due to stereotypical belief that women would respond hysterically and scare away rapist. Failure to warn potential victims: tort law. Negligence of police investigators to warn women when it is in their duty of care . Failed obligation to prevent crime and protect life and. R v. ewanchuk: 17-year-old girl agrees to job interview in ewanchuk"s van, which is then property moved to trailer behind van. Accused initiated touching, which she refused on each occasion stating no . Any compliance was out of fear, and he knew she wasn"t a willing participant: defense of implied consent , conviction of sexual assault requires proof brd of; Accused committed the actus reus. (unwanted sexual touching) Had necessary mens rea (intention of touching knowing of lack of consent by actions or words)

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents