Study Guides (248,609)
Canada (121,634)
Biology (381)
BIOL 230 (19)
Midterm

BIOL 230 Midterm Notes.docx

6 Pages
364 Views

Department
Biology
Course Code
BIOL 230
Professor
Roy Turkington

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 6 pages of the document.
Description
BIOL 230 Midterm Notes: Ecology: (1) the study of growth, development, and interactions between species and their environment on a variety of scales (2) the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance (3) ways in which environmental factors and organisms interact to bring about patterns (4) study of everything present in a habitat and why they are present Ecological investigations: Descriptive ecology: surveying and collecting Functional ecology: asking proximate (immediate, now, near future) questions about how current factors act to influence organisms and systems Evolutionary ecology: asking ultimate questions about why organisms and systems today act as they do Accuracy: true representation of what’s happening in nature, all variables acting and unmanipulated Precision: all variables measured precisely, to determine their effects in the absence of “background noise” More manipulation  more precise  less accurate  lab-based Less manipulation  less precise  more accurate  field studies Natural experiments: completely unplanned events where data and observations could be collected Semi-natural experiments: planned, but not as an experiment Controlled manipulative experiments: planned experiments where variables are manipulated and controlled either on a large or small scale Replication: producing the same experiment in multiples in different but similar locations (i.e. multiple plots on a field)  not repetition (repeating experiment multiple times in same place or other places, but not because of ecological considerations)  Environmental heterogeneity  experimental site probably heterogeneous  takes into account either really good or really bad sites  Stochastic events  could happen + ruin or give weird results Global patterns of species richness:  Highest near the tropics, lowest near the poles  opposite for things like seabirds  Intermediate or variable in temperate regions  Must reflect difference between species added (speciation) and species loss (extinction) o As S increases, speciation levels off whereas extinction rises exponentially Area Hypothesis:  Physical  abiotic mechanism  Process of plate tectonics  arrangements of continents + oceans are changing  last 100 million years or so, large continental land masses near the tropics  Larger A more room for more species  hold more species  tropics have more species  Implies pop’ns able to exist at high abundance + on avg each pop’n will occupy large A  less likely to go extinct as result of stochastic events  Works well only for recent past  global patterns of S may have been diff. in past  More coincidental than mechanism Productivity Hypothesis:  Ecological mechanism  more productivity  higher “carrying capacity”  Tropics are constantly sunny, wet and warm  good producing conditions  lots for consumers to eat  lots of consumers to eat  encourages low extinction rates + high speciation  I.e.) good conditions for growth + survival  plants are productive  herbivores are productive o Predators become numerous + diverse  keep prey abundances low  less likely to be driven extinct by competition o Steady food supply  little niche overlap  even unspecialized predators can persist  No starvation, little competition  low extinction rates + specialization  speciation = high S  Claims “carrying capacity” is greater: o More productive, large pop’ns o Lots of low-abundance pop’ns o Carrying capacity is pop’n specific, not based on community Museum Hypothesis:  Evolutionary mechanism  less disturbances, lower extinction rate, more speciation time  Disturbances strike more often + more severely at higher latitudes  more extinctions/unit time  Tropics have been compressed by large scale disturbances  maintained tropical conditions  relatively fewer extinction  long-term persistence  Long history of consistent, relatively undisturbed systems  more time for excess of speciation over extinction to occur  Cradle Hypothesis: tropical diversity acts as a “source” for higher latitudes  when conditions are favourable, dispersal occurs Species-Area Graphs:  Show the role of area, comparing islands to other patches  Steeper slope of line (after logged)  greater difference in species richness among sampling areas  Mainlands + islands controlled by rates of dispersal and extinction o Mainland  immigration rates greater, extinction rates lower  A has smaller effects on these factors  gentler slope Rescue Effect:  Species X lost at particular locality by stochastic events  resources capable of supporting Species X, unused  X individuals from neighbouring localities move in  short-range dispersal  Adaptive dispersal: individuals gain advantage by moving into new area  little to no competition  Smaller A  fewer X individuals  same size disturbance  kills all individuals  cannot operate Extinction vs. Immigration Rates on Islands:  Area influences mostly extinction rates  in a smaller area  smaller pop’ns  higher densities  takes a small disturbance to lower abundance below sustainable value  i.e. more likely to go extinct statistically  Distance influences mostly immigration rates  further away from mainland or source  harder to reach/ less likely to reach  lower immigration rates Equilibrium Theory of Biogeography:  As S increases, extinction rates increase exponentially and immigration rates decrease exponentially  Where they cross, there’s an equilibrium  the ideal species richness  At S : eq o Disturbance  initially E>I  SE  eqS  more competition  E increase until E=I  E Trends: o S low  life easy  few predators + competitors o As S increases  more probable that resources will be used up efficiently  i.e. little to no leftovers  species expect reduction in density  more likely to fall below sustainable size o S high  pop’ns are small + stressed  disturbance or resource shortage  easy extinction o Affected by A  smaller, lower S; larger, higher S  I Trends: o S small  any successfully establishing species will be new  relatively high o Source has limited number of species available to reach island  these species will arrive + establish quickly  no longer count as new  rate reduces o New species run out  all have already reached the island  trails off the zero o Affected by d  farther, smaller S; closer, bigger S 6 Biogeographic Regions: 1. Nearctic  North America 2. Neotropical  South America + Caribbean 3. Ethiopian  Africa (minus northern tip) 4. Oriental  South Asian  India, Thailand, Malaysia, etc. 5. Palearctic  Eurasia 6. Australasian  Australia + New Guinea  Vicariance: the evolutionary separation of a species due to barriers  a range of distribution in the past becoming a patchy distribution in the present o Major cause of distinctness of regional biotas  Endemism: limitations of species or sets of species to one area  Vicariant biotas come into contact  dispersal of previously isolated organisms  Glacial periods  colder periods  less forest  more grassland  easier corridors for dispersal o Lower sea levels  more land exposed  land bridges for dispersal + more room for settlement Filters: factors limiting the distribution of organisms, determine which species will be able to become predominant in an area 1) Regional Species Gene Pool  gamma diversity  all species within reach for potential dispersal F1) Dispersal  weeds out species unable to reach a specific habitat  lack capacity to move there  distance, time, terrain F2) Abiotic factors  weeds out species unable to withstand habitat conditions  T, pH, moisture F3) Biotic factors  species interactions  weeds out species which cannot tolerate the presence of other organisms already established  predators, competitors, etc. 2) Local community  alpha diversity  all species within a locality Alpha diversity: count of all species present in one site within the study region Gamma diversity: count of all species present in all sampling sites in the region defined by you Beta diversity: measure of relative similarity of alpha regions in the gamma region (species turnover)  measures species-sharing within localities  high when many species are narrowly localized  relates well to filters  sites have different filters, i.e. differ in distances from other areas with other species present, in what types of abiotic +biotic variables prevail  similar filters  low Beta Resource: anything which is in limited supply, which will be unavailable to others after use, which is required for survival, which cannot be replaced by an alternative  essential, depletable, nonsubstitutable Conditions: property
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit