SOC346H5 Chapter 7 Answers.docx

2 Pages
76 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC346H5
Professor
Nicholay Shohitov
Semester
Summer

Description
Chapter 7 1. Please describe Spierenburg’s criticism of Discipline and Punish (p. 158 – 159).  Like Durkheim and marx, F’s explanation only provides a partial part of punishment  Neither punishment nor penal history can be fully understood in terms of power  A wider and more pluralistic view is needed!  Historians were hesitant with F’s work.  One criticism was when and why was the practice of public torture abandoned. In F’s work, he says that public torture was used between 1750-1820 and this is what historians (like Spierenburg) were challenging. S says that elimination of public torture should not be viewedas an independent event but instead as a stage in changing privatized punishments. In addition, the elimination of public torture were in fact ended near 1600.  Langbein suggests that the change in law may be a result of abandonment of torture. Brown suggests the whole confession system( using torture to take evidence) is set upon religious beliefs and had been altered before any penal practice was taken place.  F cannot ignore or reduce facts and just say that it is all because of power  Also criticised for failing to supply the kind of evidence that the argument makes. We were told that prison form found its way into our society through disciplinary strategies rather than an outcome in penal theories. However Patton points out that there needs to be evidence to support and none were offered 2. What kinds of arguments were used against Foucault’s conception of the creation of a criminal class? (p. 160)  F presents no evidence. He only lists the characteristics of modern punishment and implies that it started almost 200 years ago. Research showed that it had only started in the early 12h century and still not settled now, ex: fines. Additionally, discipline and normalization had never banished punitive penal process. Our penal system now is still punitive 3. Why is Discipline and Punish not a historical work? (p. 162)  It should be viewed as a work that purposes a new way of thinking  We study punishment in a way where we assume everything is oriented to enhance control and max power. 4. Why is the radical perspective often insightful and revealing? (p. 163)  It produces questions and later answered with evidence and explanations  He does not believe that this penal system will fail 5. What did prevent us from application of several very effective forms of punishment to criminal offenders? (p. 164).  Cultural and sensibilities limits which forms of punishment are tolerable (ex: no brain washing, blood sanctions) 6. What might be an alternative explanation of
More Less

Related notes for SOC346H5

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit