CRJU 310A Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Corn Flakes, Vagueness Doctrine, Skull Fracture
Document Summary
Know case details and decisions for the exam. Know why the courts either affirmed or reversed the cases. Convicted of use any chemical weapon toxic chemical and its precursors. Issue: application of federal law to a minor personals state rule. Analysis: concerned about the use of this law on a clear state law, breach of local criminal conduct. Nothing in this law that this type of chemical weapon attack was meant by congress. Dissent: in this circumstance it was not meant to apply, need to find the law. Charged with indecent immodest or filthy act in the presence of others. Law was too vague void for vagueness doctrine law must be clear. Claimed criminal harassment that conduct or speech seriously alarmed the victim. Conduct is not protected by the first amendment. Deviant sexual intercourse any contact between any part of the genitals between the mouth or object of another person.
