BLAW 3230 : Case Studies Exam 2
Document Summary
#8 amber parker vs. indiana high school athl. Scheduled girls bball games on non-preferred date and time. Must determine whether disparity in scheduling is substantial enough to deny equality of athletic opportunity. No irreparable harm if not allowed to participate. #9 sisson vs. virginia high school league to liability; there must be a constitutionally recognized duty to act. Does not prohibit participation in state championship, deprive of role models, inhibit skills or development, or prevent team building. Waiver will not be considered if the student repeats a grade after making satisfactory grades for promotion to the next level. No constitutionally protected interest in participating in interscholastic athletics. No equal protection liability -before state actor"s failure to act can give rise. They didn"t have any duty to act equal protection liability. One day too old repeated 3rd grade at pvt. He wasn"t required to repeat 3rd grade; parents elected for him to do so to.
