DBQ #2 Fall of the Western Roman Empire.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Rutgers University
History, American
Margaret Ingate

Donna Kwon September 25, 2007 Mrs. Hannah Social Studies DBQ #2: Fall of the Western Roman Empire Rome, the splendor of the ancient world, superlative of all empires, glory of all who once lived, supreme height of civilizations, toppled by the uncivilized barbarians of the outside world? Impossible! And yet, it had happened. The Franks, Vandals, and the Visigoths marched through Rome, watching as their tribes burned down buildings and towns. Not only had the barbarians crumbled the proud cities and hard accomplishments of the advanced Romans, those vulgar outsiders had somehow managed to crush and grind the Roman civilization into powder! However, the enemies of Rome did not deserve all recognition in causing Rome to fall. They were more of the plunderers, claiming rights to the destruction of Rome in which they had only pulled the last straw. Rome had countless problems even before the outsiders came through with their onslaught. The “fall” of the Western Roman Empire was not as much of a fall as a gradual decline. It is a misconception that the end of the empire came abruptly. The so-called fall was a measured, steady pace of deterioration from the inside out over an estimate of a hundred years. And whilst Rome was rotting like an apple, barbarians, or non-Romans, were “biting” into the skin of Rome. A very broad view of how Rome fell is described in Document 1, a passage from The Course of Civilization. This crude image of why Rome had died leaves out truly insightful reasons, and yet it states truth. Document 1 avers that people did not think that Rome was worth saving. It also admonishes that the Romans could not organize to defend their country and that the social classes had changed dramatically. The armies were consisted of almost all Germans. The army was weak and unorganized, and could not have possibly been able to protect the Roman Empire. As for the social class, there was only the very rich people, and the very poor people. Middle class? What’s that? There was no middle class anymore, and so a huge gap between the social classes appeared. People could see that Rome was slowly falling, and yet could not or would not raise a hand to stop it. This proves my thesis, as it stated that Rome had been crumbling. Rome had serious issues when it came to SPQR, Senatus Populusque Romanus. The thing was people stopped caring what happened to their country. In other words, the citizens of Rome became greedy. A few rich people built mansions for themselves, not caring that the land they were building on used to be a park, for example. Instead of improving parks or giving money to charity, things that would benefit everyone, people began to spend on luxurious items. And of course, these greedy people
More Less

Related notes for 01:512:103

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.