PSY 457LEC Study Guide - Fall 2018, Comprehensive Midterm Notes - Habituation, Visual Acuity, Sensorineural Hearing Loss

82 views37 pages
11 Oct 2018
Department
Professor
PSY 457LEC
MIDTERM EXAM
STUDY GUIDE
Fall 2018
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 37 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 37 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Aug 29, 2018
Theories in cognitive development
Where does our knowledge come from?
Nature (Rationalism): we may seem to learn from experience, but we knew it all along. It was all planted in
our heads.
Nurture (empiricism): it may look as if your knowledge exceeds our experience, but it was all first in the
senses
Constructivism: children create their own understanding of the world, through experiencing things and
reflecting from those experiences
Nativism vs empiricism
Cognitive science framing of nature/nurture: where does knowledge come from?
Nativist: innate knowledge and innate learning mechanism Impose biases in interpretation of certain
domains of information. We are made to learn certain things certain ways.
domain specific learning mechanisms
What could innate knowledge be?
If you let go of an object, which way does it fall?
Empiricist: people born as blank slates - all that is available is a general learning mechanisms that is applied
across cognitive domains. We can learn anything
general-purpose learning mechanisms
Piaget
First and still one of the most influential theories on cognitive development
Where does knowledge come from?
Children are not just mini-adults
Interested in how child interpret psychics, numbers, liquids, morality
Studied children by questioning them on their reasoning
Children are ‘active thinkers’ or ‘little scientist’
Constantly update understanding of the world around them
Piaget Theory
Children and adults are fundamentally diff in how they think
Children development can be characterized in terms of stages
Early reasoning differs qualitatively from later reasoning
At any given point in development can be characterized in terms of stages
Stages of Development
Sensorimotor Stage (birth to 2 yrs)
At birth, child’s cognitive system restricted to motor reflects
Children build on these reflects to develop more sophisticated procedures
Repeat in advert behaviors, generalize behaviors to other situations, develop chains of
behaviors
Beginning of mental representations: Learning object permanence
Failure in A-not-B task - child continuously to search the object where it was perviously
hidden
Preoperational Stage (2 - 7 yrs)
Learning to represent the world symbolically: mental imagery, drawing, language, math
Pretend play
Narrow attention
Can only represent the static; no transitions: Conservation is difficult
Egocentric: world only seen from their own perspective
Concrete Operational Stage (7 - 11 yrs)
Ta k e o t h e rs p o v ; t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t m u l t i p l e p e r s p e c t i v e s
Can represent transitions; conservation
Become increasingly logic, stronger problem solvers
Don’t yet consider all logically possible outcomes
Do not understand highly abstract concepts.
Formational Operations Stage (11 >)
Reason in terms of theories and abstractions
Start reasoning about the future and consequences
More adult like reasoning
Solving an even wider variety of problems
Children are little scientist.
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 37 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Aug 31, 2018
Methods in Cognitive Development
What us innate and what is constant
Innate
Just learning mechanisms (empiricism)
Mechanism & beginning stage (constructivism)
Resilent constant bias (nativism)
Constant
Just learning mechanisms (empiricism, constructivism)
Resilent constant bias (nativism)
Challenges to Piaget
Issues with ‘stages’
Less sudden changes than it may have seemed
Reasoning not always similar (e.g., number conservation < liquid quantity conservation)
Many individual differences
Development can be accreted through training
Discoveries of early competencies
Object permanence by 3-4 months
Advanced understanding of taste and weight by the preschool yrs
Some early understanding of #
Early understanding of causality
Early categorization
Thinking ahead in 5-yrs old
Experimental Issues
Experiments not always run in a consistent fashion
Handwriting notes (no videotaping)
Small sample size, unrepresentative sample
Verbal reasoning may not represent abilities (lack of performance doesn’t always mean lack of
competence)
Materials not always adapted to age
How to overcome experimental issues?
How can we test infants and toddlers?
We can learning from watching them, but do they really show all they know? Probably not
Perhaps we can gather info from parents?
Not without issues:
Useless a child is extremely delayed, parents often don’t consider their child development to be
slow
Differences in parents’ attitudes across societies
Can only ask about current developments
Parents need to be trained
Use children’s natural behavior
1. Conditioning - Little Albert - do infants really learn this way?
2. Preferential Looking
Given 2 objects to look at, infants look at the most interesting one
Shortly after birth, infants have visual preferences
This means that they must discriminate the images
Babies aren’t blind when they are born (though visually not great)
In recent years, we have started to use more sophisticated ways of testing visual testing.
Robert dantz was the first to set-up this procedure using a “looking chamber”
Children in box with 2 visual display on ceiling
Experimenter observed and coded the infants eyes by looking through a peephole
How long do they look at the object?
3. Forced choice
Another way to test for children early preferences is a forced choice task
Only works once infants have figured out grabbing
4. Ta s t e / s m e l l t a s k
In the olfactory domain, we can test infants’ preferences for certain smells over others
Feed infants different types of food
Examine: facial features, crying, amount consumed
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 37 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Constructivism: children create their own understanding of the world, through experiencing things and reflecting from those experiences. Nativist: innate knowledge and innate learning mechanism impose biases in interpretation of certain domains of information. Children and adults are fundamentally diff in how they think. Useless a child is extremely delayed, parents often don"t consider their child development to be slow. Jut because infants don"t have a preference or one of the 2 items ,that doesn"t mean they can"t tell the difference. Advanced understanding of taste and weight by the preschool yrs. Experimenter observed and coded the infants eyes by looking through a peephole. Compute when the baby"s sucking tails off, and then change sound. Simple principle: if you show something to an infant often enough, they jul get bored. If they can detect the difference, they should. Visual fixation (older children: when baby looks.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers