AIR102 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: Empirical Relationship, Serval
Document Summary
Ending of the cold war and 9/11 and anglo-american invasion of iraq. The conceptual and empirical relationship between terrorism and insurgency. Politi(cid:272)al (cid:448)iole(cid:374)(cid:272)e i(cid:374)to a si(cid:374)gle (cid:858)glo(cid:271)al terror (cid:374)et(cid:449)ork(cid:859) Almost meaningless word because used so commonly. There is a way, moreover the distinction between terrorism and insurgency is highly relevant to the design of appropriate counter. War is (cid:858)a(cid:374) a(cid:272)t of for(cid:272)e to (cid:272)o(cid:373)pel the e(cid:374)e(cid:373)y to do our (cid:449)ill(cid:863) The true differentiation is possible: the central argument presented here is that are two distinct strategies of irregular war. Key difference are not those of targets, tactics, causes r motivation. Rather of political, organisational and relational features that follow from the strategy in question. One of the nature of the organisations. Ultimate political objective of strategy of insurgency is to gain political-military control. Exercise of political power depends on tactic or explicit agreement of the population, or submissiveness. Battle for population is major characteristic for revolutionary (insurgent) war.
