ATS1835 Chapter Notes - Chapter 4: Susan R. Wolf, Moral Agency, Free Agent

52 views4 pages

Document Summary

Incompatibilists will quickly point out that such an analysis is insufficient. For an agent who would have done otherwise if they had tried cannot be blamed for their action if they could not have tried. Any conditional analysis of they could have done otherwise seems too weak to satisfy the condition of freedom. For the claim that an agent can be moral only so far as his actions are psychologically determined - if our institutions require that both these claims are right, then the concept of moral responsibility must be incoherent. It seems that an agent can be morally praiseworthy even though they are determined to perform the action they perform. Free will is often defined as the sort of freedom required for moral responsility. Frankfurt argues that pap is false - to show this he developed the exmple of jones and black.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents