PSYC104 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: Publication Bias, Literature Review

61 views3 pages
PSYC104 Research Design Reading
Chapter 3 [Communicating Science]
3.2.1 Chapter Outline
- Finding Information about Science
- Writing a Scientific Paper
- Oral Presentations
- Posters
3.3 Finding Information about Science
3.3.1 Scientific vs. Non-Scientific Sources of Information
- Peer review: a process where the manuscripts submitted to scientific publications are
critiques by other scientists working in the relevant area of study
- The file-drawer problem: publication bias resulting from journals only publishing positive
results
- Open access journals: academic journals available online for free and willing to publish a
wider variety of studies than traditional journals
- When looking at a piece of information that makes some sort of psychological claim, it is a
good idea to ask these questions
o What am I being asked to believe?
o What evidence support this position?
o Are there other ways the evidence could be interpreted?
o What other evidence would I need to evaluate these alternatives?
o What are the most reasonable conclusions?
3.3.2 Searching for Scientific Publications
- Parameters: search options that allow one to seek out information that meets specific
requirements
- Using psychology-specific online databases allows you to find information from psychology-
specific sources and to search using more specific parameters or search options
3.3.3 Reading a Scientific Paper
- Meta-analysis: statistical technique of combining and analysing the results from multiple
studies
- When reading a research report, you should be asking the same questions that you should
ask in regards to media reports
o What am I being asked to believe?
o What evidence support this position?
o Are there other ways the evidence could be interpreted?
o What other evidence would I need to evaluate these alternatives?
o What are the most reasonable conclusions?
- Knowing the basic anatomy of a research article would help you locate all of this information
and use it to draw appropriate conclusions
o Abstract
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Peer review: a process where the manuscripts submitted to scientific publications are critiques by other scientists working in the relevant area of study. The file-drawer problem: publication bias resulting from journals only publishing positive results. Open access journals: academic journals available online for free and willing to publish a wider variety of studies than traditional journals. Parameters: search options that allow one to seek out information that meets specific requirements. Using psychology-specific online databases allows you to find information from psychology- specific sources and to search using more specific parameters or search options. Meta-analysis: statistical technique of combining and analysing the results from multiple studies. Knowing the basic anatomy of a research article would help you locate all of this information and use it to draw appropriate conclusions: abstract. Abstract: a brief summary of a research report. A(cid:374) a(cid:271)stra(cid:272)t i(cid:373)(cid:373)ediately follo(cid:449)s the arti(cid:272)le"s title a(cid:374)d authors. Co(cid:374)tai(cid:374)s (cid:272)o(cid:373)pressed i(cid:374)for(cid:373)atio(cid:374) a(cid:271)out a study"s goals, hypotheses, (cid:448)aria(cid:271)les, (cid:373)ethods,

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents