Textbook Notes (368,566)
Canada (161,966)
Biology (27)
BIOL 3300 (1)
Chapter

Biology 3300- Adaptation

5 Pages
52 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Biology
Course
BIOL 3300
Professor
Theresa Burg
Semester
Spring

Description
Biologth3300 Feb.24 , 2014 Adaptation- Chapter 10 Only natural selection can produce adaptation - Mutation and migration can introduce new alleles Adaptation  trait (s) that increase individual fitness Oxpeckers believed to reduce numbers of ticks on cattle Spend 85% of the time grooming cattle, probing in the ear - Exclusion experiments o Control group: birds o Experimental group: birds excluded  How are the birds excluded? • A man literally chased the birds around to keep them away from the cattle  How many individuals were looked at? o 1 month: two groups o 2 month: switch treatments o 3 month: randomly reassigned cattle o At the beginning and end of each month measurements were made:  Amount of earwax  Were birds drinking blood  The number of ticks o We predict the number of ticks would increase when the birds were excluded  We can see in 2 instances (trials 1&3) that cattle did have a larger number of ticks when the birds were excluded  There was 1 case where less ticks were found with birds excluded  None of the cases are significantly different from one another  Small sample sizes  Based on this data it does not appear that the birds have an impact on the number of ticks present o We predict more ear wax when no birds.  Does appear to have a correlation between the amount of earwax and the presence/absence of birds  All significant cases - Concluded that Oxpeckers eat earwax (and blood – not shown), but cattle are not the native hosts for Oxpeckers - When studying adaptations o Differences among populations/species are not always adaptive, may be mutation and drift o Not every trait is a result of an adaptation o Adaptations are compromises (ex: horns in big horn sheep- larger horns can help in fighting but become very heavy) 3 Approaches to Studying Adaptation - Experimental o Threat display by tephritid fly appears similar to the jumping spider  Have similar color, similar levels of striping, moved wings/arms  Possibility for mimicry  Hypotheses: 1) Null: flies do not mimic jumping spider 2) Flies mimic spider to deter non-spider predators 3) Flies mimic spider to deter predation by spiders • A is untreated  both variables present • B own wings cut and reglued (control used to see if regluing has an effect) • C has no pattern on the wings • D attached tephritid fly wings to housefly • E untreated  both variables absent  Predictions: 1) (no mimicry) all predators will attack fly 2) (mimicry deters other predators) A&B (banded wings on tephritid fly) will deter other predators only 3) (mimicry deters spiders) A&B will deter spiders only  Control worked so we can look at what the data tells us (A&B are NOT different)  25% of the time there was an attack on fly C  Conclude that both the pattern and wing waving are important in deterring jumping spiders  We can reject hypothesis 1  there is some mimicry  We can reject hypothesis 2  We fail to reject hypothesis 3 - Observational
More Less

Related notes for BIOL 3300

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit