ECON 202 Chapter Notes - Chapter 4: Abc Me, Marginal Product, Budget Constraint

30 views2 pages
First, the slope of the budge constraint is minus Pc/Pf because consuming one less unit of
cloth saves the economy Pc; this is enough to purchase Pc/Pf extra units of food
ā—‹
Second, the budget constraint is tangent to the production possibility frontier at the chosen
production point. Thus, the economy can always afford to consume what it produces.
ā—‹
Figure 4
-
11 has two important features
ā€¢
We notice that in the absence of trade, the economy would've produce what it consumed.
(point 2 in figure 4
-
11)
1.
We notice that it's possible for a trading economy to consume more of
both
goods than it
would've in the absence of trade. The budget constraint in figure 4
-
11 represents all the
possible combinations of food and cloth that the country could consume given the world
relative price of cloth. Part of that budget constraint, the part in the colored region,
represents situations in which the economy consumes more of both than it could in the
absence of trade. Notice that this result doesn't depend on the assumption that pretrade
production and consumption is at point 2; unless pretrade production is at point 1, so that
trade has no effect on production at all, there is always a part of the budget constraint that
allows the consumption of more of both goods.
2.
Observe that if the economy as a whole consumes more of both goods, then it's possible in
principle to give each
individual
more of both goods.
3.
To illustrate that trade is a source of potential gain for everyone, see the next three steps
ā€¢
The fundamental reason why trade potentially benefits a country is that it expands the economy's
choices.
ā€¢
That everyone could gain from trade unfortunately does not mean that everyone actually does.
ā€¢
In the real world, a portion of the labour force in those importing
-
competing sectors also
lose because they can't transit to the export sectors.
ā—‹
Those who stand to lose most from trade are the immobile factors in the import-competing
sector.
ā€¢
Every change in a nation's economy including technological progress, shifting consumer
preferences, etc. affects income distribution, not just international trade so who cares
ā—‹
There are "safety net" of income support programs to cushion the losses of groups hurt by
trade. If this safety net is feeling inadequate, more support rather than less trade is the
answer
ā—‹
Those who stand to lose from increased trade are typically better organized than those who
stand to gain. Many trade restrictions tend to favour the most organized groups, which are
often not the most in need of income support
ā—‹
Reasons why economists do not generally stress the income distribution effects of trade:
ā€¢
The political economy of trade: a preliminary view
In the modern world, restrictions on the flow of labour are legion
-
just about every country
imposes restriction on immigration
ā€¢
In the previous sections, we saw how workers move between the cloth and food sectors within
one country until the wages are equalized, so with international migration to high
-
wage countries.
ā€¢
Assume two countries produce one good with labour and an immobile factor
-
land.
ā€¢
In the absence of migration, wage differences across countries can be driven by technology
differences, or alternatively, by differences in the availability of land relative to labour.
ā€¢
International labour mobility
ECON 231 Page 11
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions