Textbook Notes (367,917)
Canada (161,498)
POL214Y5 (32)
Chapter 18

POL214 - Chapter 18 Notes.docx
Premium

5 Pages
153 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL214Y5
Professor
Erin Tolley
Semester
Fall

Description
POL214 Week 3; Chap 18 Federalism & Canada's Regions Chapter 18 -The Federal System  The provinces are autonomous within the powers given them by the Constitution, but the territories are constitutionally subordinate to the federal govt.  The federal system is closely related to regional, economic cleavages and regional identities; it is imp for ethnic cleavages and identities; it influences the Canadian pol culture, and it affects the operation of the electoral system, pol parties & advocacy groups.  Federalism can be defined as a division of powers b/w central & regional govts such that neither is subordinate to the other. Provinces are “coordinate” or equal in status to the central govt.  This equality of status is provided for in the constitutional division of powers between the 2 levels of govt, which is found primarily in sections 91 & 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867.  The institution of federalism are embedded in a very diverse “federal society” that supports such a 2- tier structure of govt.  When the provinces are all treated alike by the constitution and by the federal govt, the system is called “symmetrical federalism”, and when they are singled out for distinctive treatment, the term asymmetrical federalism is used. The Confederation Settlement  The fundamentals of Canadian federalism, often called the Confederation Settlement, were incorporated into the British North America Act, 1867, which in 1982 was renamed the Constitution Act 1867. The Confederation Settlement was not consistent with the modern def of federalism because in certain respects the provinces were made subordinate to the central govt.  As far the division of powers b/w the central and provincial govts was concerned, the Fathers of Confederation gave the provinces 16 specific enumerated powers in section 92 (e.g hospitals and municipal institutions) and then left everything else- the residual powers-to Ottawa, in section 91.  Section 91 also included a list of 29 federal powers, such as trade/commerce & national defence. The fathers gave Ottawa the power to levy any mode or system of taxation, which included both direct and indirect taxes. Evolution of Canadian Federalism to 2000  The very centralized federation created in 1867 became the highly decentralized Canada of today. This trend can be documented in all three areas- the division of powers, financial resources, and federal controls. Division of Powers  The evolution of the division of powers between federal & provincial govts can be examined in 2respects; formal constitutional amendments that altered the division of powers, and judicial decisions that interpreted sections 91, 92 & 132 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Constitutional Amendments  Since 1867, only 5 formal constitutional amendments have been adopted that directly affected the division of powers.  1 , in 1940, unemployment insurance was added to the list of federal powers in section 91 after the courts had earlier declared it to belong to the provinces. Page 1 of 5 POL214 Week 3; Chap 18 Federndism & Canada's Regions  2 , in 1951, old age pensions were made a concurrent power, allowing the federal govt into this area as well.  Finally, in the Constitution Act, 1982, the new section 92A increased provincial jurisdiction over natural resources, while the Charter of Rs & Fs generally reduced the powers of both levels of govt. Judicial Interpretation  Before 1949, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) in London was Canada’s final court of appeal, and most constitutional decisions were rendered by that body.  Its decisions had a major impact in transforming the nature of Canadian federalism from a centralized to a decentralized system. The JCPC decisions can be examined primarily in terms of the Peace, Order and Good Govt clause, the Trade and Commerce power, and the Treaty power.  In addition to drawing a rigid line between interprovincial trade (federal) and intra-provincial trade (provincial) , the courts created a no-man’s land wherever the 2 kinds of trade were unavoidably combined.  The general result of this interpretation was to enhance the provincial power over property and civil rights, and to downgrade the federal commerce power. Federal-Provincial Finance  In the Confederation Settlement, the federal govt was given the power to levy any kind of tax, while the provinces were restricted to direct taxation.  Ottawa assumed provincial debts (also paying debt allowances to those provinces with smaller debts) and paid unconditional grants to the province.  A wholesale change in the grant system followed in 1907. By this time, too, provinces had begun to levy their own direct personal and corporate income taxes.  With both levels of govt taxing the same personal & corporate incomes, but in a totally uncoordinated fashion, and with the 2 levels starting to become intertwined in conditional grant programs, the federal-provincial financial situation became increasingly complicated.  State of affairs worsened with the advent of the Depression, when ever fewer funds were available to go around. The result was the appointment of the Rowell-Sirois Commission.  1 of the recommendations of its 1940 report-that the costly responsibility for unemployment insurance be transferred to the federal govt- was quickly implemented by means of a constitutional amendment.  The complicated federal-provincial financial situation since 1940 might be simplified somewhat by taking 3 aspects separately: taxation agreements, conditional and block grants, and equalization payments. Equalirdtion Payments  The 3 aspect of federal-provincial finance consists of equalization payments. In 1957 the federal govt began to pay unconditional grants to have not provinces based on provincial need, so that all provinces could offer a relatively equal standard of services.  Any province whose total per capita revenue is below the average receives a payment based on the per capita shortfall multiplied by the province’s population. Page 2 of 5 POL214 Week 3; Chap 18 Federalism & Canada's Regions Other provincial and territorial revenues  The combination of unanticipated federal grants, direct taxes, and natural resource revenues has contributed significantly to the enhanced status of the provinces in the Canadian federal system.  It should be added that pressure for decentralization and for turning taxation power over to the provinces comes from those provinces that have substantial personal and corporate incomes to tax.  The 2 levels of govt began by operating more or less independently of each other, taxing and spending in different areas, w/ federal grants being unconditional in nature. As time went on, the federal and provincial govts became closely intertwined by taxation agreements on the revenue side and by conditional and block grant programs in terms of expenditure. Federal Controls  The 1867 Constitution Act contained 3 specific federal controls over the provinces: reservation, disallowance, and the declaratory power. The decline in the use of these powers has also enhanced the stature of the provinces.  Of the 5 parts of the Confederation Settlement, then 3 have contributed to the decentralization of Canadian federalism: the division of powers, federal-provincial finance, and federal controls.  But some of the societal forces underlying this decentralizing evolution should be identified explicitly. They include geography- the distances, divisions, and some very large provinces, the development of strong, distinctive provincial and regional identities and pol cultures ; and Quebec nationalism, characterized by demands for more powers, which were often echoed by other provinces. Phases of Canadian Federalism Canadian Federalism, 1867-1945  The period 1867-96 can be classified as 1 of quasi-federalism, in which the provinces were subordinate to Ottawa. The period 1896-1914 can be termed one of classical federalism.  During these years the 2 levels were equal in s
More Less

Related notes for POL214Y5

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit