Textbook Notes (368,107)
Canada (161,650)
Psychology (4,889)
Chapter

2990 Psych Textbook Notes 1, 2docx.docx

15 Pages
112 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
Psychology 2020A/B
Professor
Doug Hazlewood
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 1: Psychology and The Law Canadian Justice System consists of: civil law - one party (the plaintiff) brings a complaint against another (the defendant) for violating the former's right in some way. criminal law - when police arrest a suspect and a judge decides whether there is enough evidence to press formal charges. (sometimes at a preliminary hearing, a judge decides whether there will be a trial). - In criminal cases, first impression of the accused and of witnesses have a powerful effect on police investigators and jurors (primacy effect). Attributions about what causes the criminal behaviour are made by police, lawyers, jurors, and the judge; prejudice beliefs and stereotypical ways of thinking affect those attributions. - most common cause of an innocent person's being convicted of a crime is an erroneous eyewitness. - jurors rely heavily on eyewitness testimony when they are deciding whether someone is guilty. Unfortunately, jurors also tend to overestimate the accuracy of eyewitnesses. - experiment "staged calculator theft" : the first set of results reflected what we'd expect: The more visual information available about the their, the higher the percentage of students who correctly identified him in the photo lineup. The jurors overestimated the accuracy of the witnesses, especially in the condition in which the thief was difficult to identify. -In 36 of 40 of these cases, an eyewitness had falsely identified the suspect as the criminal; five of these falsely accused people were on death row when they were exonerated. (DNA evidence proved the suspect was innocent after he/she was convicted) Why are eyewitnesses often wrong: 3 stages of memory (Acquisition, Storage and Retrieval): acquisition: the process by which people notice and pay attention to information in the environment; people cannot perceive everything that is happening around them, so they acquire only a subset of the information available in the environment. Sources of error: - poor viewing conditions - people see what they expect to see - focus on weapons - own-race bias - change blindness - a number of factors limit the amount of information about a crime that people take in, such as how much time they have to watch an event and the nature of the viewing condition. Crimes usually occur under the very conditions that make acquisition difficult: quickly, unexpectedly, and under poor viewing conditions such as at night. - "julia robert's photograph experiment" - they found that accuracy in identifying the celebrities began to drop when the simulated distance exceed 7.5 meters. At 10 meters only 75 percent of the participants recognized the face, and at 23 metres, only 25 percent of the participants did. - we should also remember that eyewitnesses who are victims of a crime will be terribly afraid, making it difficult to to take everything in. The more stress people are under, the worse their memory for people involved in and the details of a crime. Another resin why they have poor memory for a suspect is that they tend to focus their attention on any weapon they see and less on the suspect's features. - information people notice and pay attention to is also influenced by what they expect to see. - for example; the case of the old lady next door who was strangled (pg. 8) own-race bias: the finding that people are better at recognizing faces within their own race than those of other races - What about the Koreans who grew up in white families? They had better memory for white faces, which is consistent with the idea that we are best at remembering faces that are of the race with which we have the most contact. - unfamiliar events or people are also more difficult to remember than familiar events of people. - when people examine same-race faces, they pay close attention to individuating features that distinguish that face from others, such as the height of the cheekbones or the contour of the forehead. They do not do this for other races unless told to. Storage: the process by which people store in memory information they have acquired from the environment Sources of error: - misleading questions - source monitoring errors - only 48 percent of the bystanders and 38 percent of the victims correctly remembered the suspect's had colour. They could only pick the criminal out of a lineup 48 percent of the time. reconstructive memory: the process by which memories of an event become distorted by information encounter after the event occurred. - when participants were again questions about the crimes, those who had been exposed to misinformation were more likely to have incorporated it into their memory of the event. - people are especially likely to incorporate misinformation in their memories when the event they have witnesses produces negative emotion - which is likely in crimes. Adults with intellectual disabilities may be especially vulnerable to being swayed by leading questions. source monitoring: the process by which people try to identify the sources of their memories. Retrieval: the process by which people recall information stored in their memory. - research shows that if a witness selects a suspect from a lineup, jurors, police, investigators and judges are likely to assume that the witness is right. - lineups have a higher success rate than the alternative of showing eyewitness only one person. However, if one person was shown and that person was innocent, a mistaken identification was four times more likely than when the same person appeared in a six-person lineup. Errors were especially likely if the innocent person worse clothing similar to that worn by the person who committed the crime. - witnesses often choose the person in a lineup who most resembles the criminal, even if the resemblance is not strong. To avoid errors police follow these steps: - ensure that everyone in the lineup resembles the witness's description of the suspect - tell the witnesses that the person suspected of the crime may or may not be in the lineup - do not always include the suspect in an initial lineup - make sure that the person conducting the lineup does not know which person in the lineup is the suspect - present pictures of people sequentially instead of simultaneously - present witnesses with photographs of people and sound recordings of their voices (together) - don't use composite face programs (where witnesses generate faces) - try to minimize the time between the crime and the identification of suspects Judging Whether Eyewitnesses are Mistaken: Does Certainty Mean Accuracy? - A witness's confidence is not strongly related to his or her accuracy. For example with the calculator theft experiment, witnesses who saw the crime under poor viewing conditions had as much confidence in their identifications as did witnesses who saw the crime under moderate or good viewing conditions, even though the former were considerably less accurate. - Jurors are also more likely to believe a confident, rather than unconfident, witnesses - a disturbing finding after obtaining this research Sings of Accurate Testimony - accurate witnesses in a photos lineup tended to say that they didn't really know how they recognized the man, that his face just "popped out" at them. Inaccurate witnesses tended to say that they used a process of elimination whereby they deliberately compared one face with another. Ironically, taking more time and thinking more carefully about the pictures was associated with making more mistakes - people are most accurate she they made their judgement quickly - in 10 seconds or less. The Problem with Verbalization: - It would seem that another way to improve accuracy of eyewitness identification would be to tell people to write down a description of the suspect as soon as they can, to help them remember what they say. However, trying to put an image of a face into words can make people's memory worse! - in the bank robbery experiment, 38 percent of the people in the verbalization condition correctly identified the robber, compared with 64 percent of the people in the non-verbalization condition. Judging Whether Eyewitnesses are Lying - some witnesses might deliberately lie (for example if a reward is involved) - people are better than chance at telling lies from truth, but their level of accuracy is not impressive: On average, people were correct only 54 percent of the time. Accuracy rates are even lower when people try to detect deception in members of other ethnic groups. - confidence that you have correctly identified the lies and truths is not strongly correlate with accuracy as well - people with a lot of experience dealing with liars (custom officers, detectives, judges) are no more accurate at detecting deception that are university students. polygraph: a machine that measures people physiological responses (e.g. heart rate); polygraph operators attempt to tell if someone is lying by observing how that person responds physiologically while answering the questions. - accuracy rate for these machines was 0.86. Because there is still a chance these machines can make a mistake (14% chance) the Canadian justice system does not allow the results of polygraph evidence to be used in court. - researches continue to try to develop better lie detectors, using measures such as patterns of brain waves, involuntary eye movements, and blood flow in the face by using high-definition thermal imagining technology. - there is some evidence that people can deliberately act in ways that reduce the validity of the results of polygraph tests, such as biting their tongue and doing mental arithmetic. Can Eyewitness Testimony Be Improved? - there is no hard evidence that people's memories improve when they are hypnotized. In fact, there is some evidence that when people are under hypnosis they are more susceptible to suggestion, coming to believe they saw things that they did not. Even worse, people tend to become more confident in their memories after they have been hypnotized, even if they are no more accurate. witness testimony that has been obtained under hypnosis is not admissible in the Canadian court. cognitive interview: A technique in which a trained interview tries to improve eye-witnesses' memories by focusing their attention on the details and context of the event. - this is done chiefly by asking the person to recall the event several times from different starting points (e.g. from the beginning or the middle) and by asking the person to create a mental image of the scene. - research found that children had better memories for activities that they had engaged in over a two-week period when they were asked to mentally "return to the scene". Other claim that the cognitive interview may in fact, increase errors and confabulations of memory especially when used with children. - reinstating the context (returning to the same room where the crime occurred) had some positive effects (e.g. better memory for what had happened) but also some negative effects (e.g. being more willing to identify someone from a lineup, regardless of accuracy). - According to leading expert Gary Wells (assisted in developing a National Institute of Justice guide for law enforcement on eye witnesses), the most effective approach for reducing the rate of false convictions in the legal system is to improve how police conduct eyewitness interviews and identification procedures. Recommendations include avoiding leading or suggestive questions when interviewing witnesses, telling witnesses that the suspect may or may not be in the lineup, and so on. The Recovered Memory Debate: recovered memories: recollections of an event, such as sexual abuse that have been forgotten or repressed - the accuracy of these memories have been hotly debated. On one side, two woman writers claim that it is not uncommon for women who were sexually abused to repress these traumas so that they have absolutely no memory of them. THe abuse and its subsequent repression, according to this view, are responsible for many psychological problems,such as depression and eating disorders. and later in life, often with help of a psychotherapist these events can be "recovered". - on the other side of the controversy are academic psychologist who argue that the accuracy of recovered memories cannot be accepted on faith. false memory syndrome: remembering a past traumatic experience that is objectively false but nevertheless accepted as true How do we know whether these recovered memories are true or not? - descriptions of fabricated traumatic events contained fewer specific details about time and place than did descriptions of actual traumas and were rated as less believed by coders (didn't know which one was true or not). - participants reported stronger emotional reactions to the fabricated traumas than to the actual traumas - even though when describing these events, fabricated accounts actually were less emotional than accounts of actual traumas. This tendency to "go over the top" when reporting on reactions to fabricated traumas was also reflected in participants' reports of how much they thought about the event, their level of traumatic stress, and their experience of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms.- all of these reactions were reported more strongly when describing a fake, rather than a real, traumatic event. - people who were fabricating remorse were more likely to show more extreme emotional displays. They also exhibited more speech hesitations and de more references to other people than those who were expressing genuine remorse. Other kind of Evidence Expert Testimony • Expert testimony has an effect on juror’s verdictsparticipants who received expert testimony in the mock juror were more likely to conclude that the woman acted out of self-defense when she murdered her husband (because she was suffering from battered wife syndrome), rather than when they had not received expert testimony. • Opinions on whether expert testimony should be used in courts vary (psychologists believe their opinions are highly useful however some judges believe that what they have to offer is common sense) Physical Evidence: • Examples such as footprints, fingerprints, samples of hair and fibres and DNA • Although DNA testing is more conclusive than many other kinds of evidence, jurors may be quick to convict based on DNA evidence, without fully understanding its limitations. • Other types of physical evidence tend not to be very persuasivephysical evidence alone is not very convincing Statistical Evidence • According to civil law, companies should be responsible if it “is more likely than not” to have been responsible (example in textbook: a bus hits and kills a dog but it is not known which bus company the bus belongs to. However 80% of the buses in that route belong to the Blue Bus company therefore they should be held responsible). • In mock cases using this example, participants were much more swayed by eyewitness testimony (being told that the bus they had seen was a Blue Bus) than by statistical evidence (that 80% of the buses on that route were from Blue Bus) Juries • Trial by jury was an established institution in England at the beginning of the 17 century and was adopted by Canada in 1867 • Jury system has often come under attack because of many wrongful convictions and the argument that jurors may lack the ability to understand complex evidence and reach a dispassionate verdict. How Jurors process information during the Trial • Some psychologists argue that jurors decide on one story that best explains all of the evidence, then they try to fit this story to the possible verdicts they are allowed to render Lawyers typically present the evidence in one of two ways: • Story order: they present the evidence in the sequence in which events occurred, corresponding as closely as possible to the story they want the jurors to believe • Witness order: they present witnesses in the sequence they think will have the greatest impact even if this means that event are described out of order (ex: leaving the best witness for last so the trial ends on a dramatic note) *When prosecutors used the story order and the defense used the witness order, te jurors were most likely to believe the prosecutor *When the prosecutor used the witness order and the defense used the story order, the tables were turned and the jurors were more likely to believe the defense. Confessions are not always what they seemthe interrogation process can go wrong n ways that elicit false confessions, even to the point where innocent suspects come to believe that they actually did commit the crime • The greater the use of influence tactics and coercive tactics, the higher the rate of confession • “Mr. Big” Technique: tends to be used in serious criminal cases and involves undercover officers enticing the suspect to commit small crimes in exchange for money and the promise of gang membership. At some point the suspect is told that he will be meeting the head of the gang or organization and reasons will be given for why the suspect needs to “come clean” before he can be accepted into the gangsometimes the suspect will be told that police have evidence that he is guilty of the crime and this produces high rates of confessions • offenders who believed that the police had strong evidence against them were more likely to confess than those who believed that the evidence was weak • in Canada interrogations and confessions are usually recorded so that the jury can judge for themselves whether the defendant was coerced into admitting something • In recordings, people thought that the confession as most voluntary (the least coerced) when the camera focused on the suspect rather than the interrogator-assuming they had more control over the situation Deliberations in the Jury Room • Even if most jurors are inclined to vote to verdict, there might be a persuasive minority that changes their fellow jurors’ minds. • However research has f
More Less

Related notes for Psychology 2020A/B

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit