Textbook Notes (369,074)
Canada (162,369)
York University (12,903)
Psychology (3,584)
PSYC 2130 (185)
Chapter 2

Chapter 2.docx

4 Pages
122 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 2130
Professor
Krista Phillips

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Chapter 2: nd  Funder’s 2 law there are no perfect indicators of personality; there are only clues, and clues are always ambiguous I. Data Are Clues  Observable aspects of personality are best characterized as clues o Always ambiguous personality resides hidden inside each individual  Infer bothrdts existence and its nature inferences based on indications that can be observed  Funder’s 3 law something beats nothing, 2 times out of 3 II. Four Kinds of Clues a. Ask the Person Directly: S Data  Self-judgements (usually a questionnaire)  Face validity intended to measure what they seem to measure, on their face o Ask questions that are directly related to the construct they are designed to measure  Asking questions that are more open-ended  Common basis for personality assessment  Advantages: o A large amount of information  You have a unique perspective on the general nature of your personality and the S data you can provide can reflect complex aspects of character that no other data source could access o Access to thoughts, feelings, and intentions  Aspects of inner mental life are private yet important, S data provide a unique and essential source of data o Definitional truth  True by definition- they have to be correct since they are themselves aspects of the self-view o Causal force  Since S data reflect what you think of yourself, they have a way of creating their own reality  Self-verification  Your view of yourself doesn’t just reflect what you think about yourself- it may be among the causes of what you do o Simple and easy  Cost-effectiveness  Disadvantages: o Maybe they won’t tell you  No way to prevent someone from withholding information, but if the person does, the accuracy of S data she provides will be compromised o Maybe they can’t tell you  Person’s memory of his behaviour is finite and imperfect  Fish-and-water effect  The way we become used to the customary behaviours of our own culture  Information might be actively distorted in memory as well  Simple lack of insight o Too simple and too easy  Overused since its cheap and easy b. Ask Somebody Who Knows: I Data  Gather opinions of the people who know that person well in daily life  Judgments  Advantages: o Large amount of information  To base a description on hundreds of behaviours in dozens of situations  Everybody has many acquaintances obtaining more than one judgement of the same person  Come from observation of behaviour in the real world o Common sense  The informant’s judgements about what the behaviours mean, in general, about the individual’s personality  An informant with ordinary common sense who transforms an observation of behaviour into a judgement of personality will take 2 kinds of contexts into account  The immediate situation  Provided by other behaviours that an informant might know about o Definitional truth  Some aspects of your personality reside in the reactions of other people o Causal force  Person’s reputation  Expectancy effect and behavioural confirmation  Disadvantages: o Limited behavioural information  Their knowledge is limited in 2 ways:  There is a sense in which each person lives inside a serious of separate compartments, and each compartment contains different people  I data provided by any one person will have limited validity as a description of what you are like in general o Lack of access to private experience  Some of every person’s life is concealed even from close acquaintances  I data provide a view of personality from the outside o Error  The judgements of personality that they offer will sometimes be mistaken  An informant’s judgement is based on what he happened to remember about the person being described and will necessarily overlook some information that might be relevant o Bias  Refers to something more systematic, such as seeing someone
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit