SOCI 2520 Chapter 3: Deviant Behavior & Social Control
17 Oct 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Mist(cid:396)ust a(cid:374)d suspi(cid:272)io(cid:374) of the pu(cid:271)li(cid:272) is f(cid:396)e(cid:395)ue(cid:374)tl(cid:455) (cid:271)(cid:396)ed f(cid:396)o(cid:373) (cid:862)(cid:449)e/the(cid:455)(cid:863) (cid:373)e(cid:374)talit(cid:455). This is (cid:373)a(cid:374)ifest i(cid:374) the te(cid:374)de(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:455) of offi(cid:272)e(cid:396)s to (cid:272)o(cid:448)e(cid:396) up ea(cid:272)h othe(cid:396)"s (cid:373)istakes. It is furthe(cid:396) (cid:272)ha(cid:396)a(cid:272)te(cid:396)ized as e(cid:454)t(cid:396)e(cid:373)el(cid:455) (cid:373)as(cid:272)uli(cid:374)e. wo(cid:373)e(cid:374)"s a(cid:272)(cid:272)epta(cid:374)(cid:272)e i(cid:374)to the g(cid:396)oup is (cid:396)esisted. Cops talk regularly about the possibilities of harm and structure their practices to ensure their well-being. The social order of the police is usually regarded as insular, suspicious, masculine, and focused on risk. There are two principal shortcomings of most accounts of police subculture: 01. They typically make a sharp distinction between formal and informal, between the legal and bureaucratic regulations that ostensibly dictate police behaviors and the less formal ethos of the subculture: 02. These discussions commonly treat police subculture as if it were a more-or-less cohesive whole. Cops are constituted as a distinct social group to the extent that their differentiation is said to exist within the police world in one of two ways:
