LAW 110 Chapter Notes - Chapter Joinder rule explanation: Impleader, Sua Sponte, Supplemental Jurisdiction

31 views4 pages
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Does the court have smj over all the claims? b. i. Fr 18(a) allows a party to join as many counter-claims as they have against the opposing party as long as their first counter-claim is allowed under fr 13. Fr 13 provides that compulsory counterclaims must be brought, and permissive counter-claims may be brought if they have independent jurisdiction (plant). Fr 13 further describes a compulsory counter-claim as being any claim that arises out of the same transaction or occurrence and is the same legal subject matter. Since we are in federal court, the court needs smj over the additional claims (federal question. If the additional claims do not have independent smj, then they may still have supplemental jurisdiction under title 28 usc 1367. Sec 1367 gives supplemental jurisdiction to claims that are so related that they are a part of the same case or controversy as the claim that has original jurisdiction.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents