LATN 1001 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1-4: Vocative Case, Linking Verb, Dative Case

30 views3 pages

27 Sep 2018

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Textbook Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Present indicative of esse" (to be) sum first person plural. They/there are case nominative genitive dative accusative ablative vocative ((cid:447)) First declension (case inflection of a noun/adjective) feminine singular feminine plural. Ae nom-a/ae . gen-ae/arum . dat-ae/is . acc-am/as . abl- /is case singular masculine (-us/er) nominative. Second declension plural masculine (-us/er) singular neuter (-um) plural neuter (-um) A nom-us/er . gen- . dat-(cid:448) . acc-um . abl-(cid:448) Imperative (commands): singular = stem / plural = stem + -te. Meanings of sentences depend on conjugations/inflections, not word order. Vs pronounced as ws in classical pronunciation. Adverbs modify verbs/adjectives/other adverbs (ex: n(cid:448)n, saepe) Subject-object-verb is common word order pattern in latin. Nominative: subject of a finite verb; also used with forms of to be" and linking verbs. Genitive: possession , generally translated with of" or apostrophes. Dative: indirect object , used with to" or for". Accusative: direct object affected by the verb, object of a preposition.

Related Questions

Good Evening My Dear Cramster Family:

I have to answer if these questions are true or false and could you tell me if I am correct with the answers I have chosen? Thank you.

1. Two countries can achieve gains from trade even if one of the countries has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods. (T)
2. Certain very talented people have a comparative advantage in everything they do. (T)
3. If a certain trade is good for one person it can't be good for the other one. (T)
4. If a certain trade is good for one person it is always good for a country, it must be good for everyone in the country. (F)

All the best,

Nettie

scarletscorpion75

Â± Biochemical Applications of the Gas Laws

The various gas laws can be used to describe air, which is a mixture of gases. In some cases, these laws have direct application to the air that we breathe.

Part A

How long does it take a person at rest to breathe one mole of air if the person breathes 82.0 mL/s of air that is measured at 25 âC and 755 mmHg?

Express your answer numerically in seconds.

SubmitHintsMy AnswersGive UpReview Part

Part B

Typically, when a person coughs, he or she first inhales about 2.00 L of air at 1.00 atm and 25 âC. The epiglottis and the vocal cords then shut, trapping the air in the lungs, where it is warmed to 37 âC and compressed to a volume of about 1.70 L by the action of the diaphragm and chest muscles. The sudden opening of the epiglottis and vocal cords releases this air explosively. Just prior to this release, what is the approximate pressure of the gas inside the lungs?

Express your answer numerically in atmospheres.

atm

SubmitHintsMy AnswersGive UpReview Part

Part C

Helium-oxygen mixtures are used by divers to avoid the bends and are used in medicine to treat some respiratory ailments. What percent (by moles) of He is present in a helium-oxygen mixture having a density of 0.518 g/L at 25 âC and 721 mmHg?

Express your answer numerically as a percentage.

%He

Brief and detail

If relativism is true, can you ever judge something as being morally wrong? Consider some really horrible actions, genocide, murder, slavery, torture or add your own. If you feel a relativist could say that these things are actually wrong, what gives them this ability? If they can't, why not?

Agree or disagree

Similarly to what I said in the first discussion on what morality means to us, I think everyone has their own set of moral principles and obligations. So I do think that relativism is true, to a point however. I used Adolf Hitler and the Nazi empire as an example in the first discussion so I will use that here. Hitler knew in his brain that what he was doing was good for his nation and arguably the world. Now, as a modern day society we can agree that was wrong. For him, it was good. In his own mind, he is right. But it is relative to the person. Generally speaking we all have similar notions of what is right and what is wrong. Most people would say that going out of your way to help someone else is a morally good principle. Selflessness in society is seen a good thing by the vast majority of people. When I say that relativism is good to a point, I mean that there is a general basis in society that deems actions as good or bad. And since most of us would all agree that hitlers actions were bad, then we say that he had bad moral principles, even though to him, they were good. It’s a little confusing even for me to put into words. Basically, if you actions are generally viewed in society as good, then you have good moral principles even if they vary from person to person. No one will have the exact same moral standards, but generally they all are very similar in society. So relativism is true until the point where the majority of society would deem your actions and wrong. I hope this makes sense.

Agree or disagree

If relativism is true, I don't think judging something as morally wrong is possible. Because the definition of ethical relativism is the moral standard only being correctly relative to each person/society, this means that the moral standard is created by you and/or the society you identify with and therefore eliminate the existence of an absolute moral principle. Since the moral standard is different for every individual, we cannot say that someone is morally wrong. If relativism is applied, that is. If a relativist were to say that they could judge someone as morally wrong, then that would contradict the main component of being a relativist. That every moral argument of yours is correct, therefore everyone else's is also correct. Quite problematic but that is my understanding on the matter

ell25

LATN 1001 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1-4: Vocative Case, Linking Verb, Dative Case

Document Summary

Get access

Related Questions