Class Notes (835,730)
Canada (509,354)
Brock University (12,091)
Psychology (853)
PSYC 2P25 (29)
Lecture 7

Lecture 7.docx

5 Pages
120 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2P25
Professor
Michael Ashton
Semester
Fall

Description
PSYC 2P25 October 29 , 2012 Evolutionary Function of Personality Evolution by Natural Selection  Individuals differ in various characteristics  These characteristics are (at least partly) heritable  Some of them are associated with number of surviving offspring individuals [the strongest in that setting will survive] o Therefore, frequencies or levels of those characteristics will change across generations o (when a population divides into two, major differences between them an evolve after many generations -> separate species emerge) Evolution and Traits  For most characteristics (traits), evolution leads to uniformity within a species -> “deviant” individuals die out  But why does evolution allow individual differences for some traits?  Some of the reasons involve “trade-offs” associated with high or low levels of a characteristic, but some of the reasons don’t Reasons not involving Trade-offs [not going to be tested]  1) “neutral” genetic variation  2) Mutation/selection balance  3) Resistance to parasites  4) Heterozygote advantage Reasons involving Trade-off  1) Frequency dependence o When most individuals have a given level of trait, some individuals might do better with a different level o E.g. Fish -> Bluegill sunfish  “parenting versus cuckolding”  Some males are “parental” -> build nest after long maturation  Other males are “cuckolding” -> mature earl, sneak into other males’ nests  When cuckolding males are rare, the have high reproductive success (can easily find many parental males’ nests and fertilize there)  When cuckolding males are common, they have low reproductive success (harder to find parental males’ nests not occupied by other cuckolding males)  Thus, success of cuckolding strategy (vs. parenting) depends inversely on frequency of that strategy o E.g. humans PSYC 2P25 October 29 , 2012  Very low levels of Honesty-Humility (H) might be a “strategy” that improves fitness when few others use it  But when many people are very low in H, they no longer thrive because not enough “victims” to go around, and people may become vigilant, retaliatory  Extraversion (X) might also be frequency-dependent:  When few people are high in X, they can easily attract social attention and its rewards (alliances, mates)  But when most people are high in X, then situation changes -> too much “competition” for social attention (so less likely to benefit) and increased “costs” (risks, energies, etc) from “competition” -> might be better off as introverted  2) Fluctuating optimum o “ideal” level of a trait (ie. Fitness), can vary across times and places according to conditions o E.g. Trinidadian guppies  Below waterfalls, may be eaten by predators (pike). Above waterfalls, no predators.  Guppies above falls are much bolder; those below falls much more timid  (differences are heritable -> observed even when guppies are raised in lab)  When predators are removed from stream, “bold” guppies do better (more successful foraging and mating?) and replace “timid” guppies over many generations  When predators added to stream, “timid” guppies do better (don’t get killed) and replace bold guppies over many generations  Thus, bold-vs-timid trade-off in Trinidadian guppies  Boldness better where no predators; timidity better where many predators o E.g. human  Traits (or at least behaviours) related to Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness might differ between farming societies and herding societies  In herding society, much potential for theft of livestock -> promotes emphasis on retaliation and deterrence (e.g. angry, violent response even to minor offense)  In farming society, less potential for theft (crops harder to move) -> favours cooperation and less retaliation  “Novelty-seeking” traits (related to high Openness low Conscientiousness?)  May differ between (sedentary) farmers and (nomadic) hunter- gatherers  For hunter-gatherers, novelty seeking promotes continuing search for better areas to hunt and gather PSYC 2P25 October 29 , 2012  But for farmers, novelty-seeking interferes with routine work of tending crops, etc.  (only indirect evidence so far) Note about Causes of Variation  Evolution can preserve individual differences caused by  1) Genetic differences (whereby genes influence trait levels)  2) Developmental plasticity (whereby genes allow flexible response to environment) Personality Disorders  Patterns of thought/feeling/behaviour that are culturally deviant, are pervasive and inflexible o Begins in teens or 20s o Are stable over time o Cause
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2P25

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit