WGST 1F90 Lecture Notes - Wgst, Intersectionality
19 Apr 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
WGST 1F90 2017-18
Question Content and Quality
_____ /30 marks
Organization
_____ /15 marks
Communication
to TA ____/5
marks
100
-90
*All questions Insightful, significant, thought provoking,
*Attended to intersectionality in a thoughtful, attentive manner.
*Extended analysis to current issues, topics.
*Presenters offered a keen and well versed comprehension of
materials.
*A deeper comprehension of materials was evident following the
discussion.
*Extremely clear, well organized, and highly coherent structure beginning
*All readings attended to thoughtfully.
*Presenters demonstrated an acute awareness of maintaining class
discussion and demonstrated superb time management.
*Handout to classmates was superb; no errors & enhanced learning (APA
format—no errors)
0-5
(sliding scale)
Questions
emailed to TA at
least 36 hours
prior to
discussion & in
WORD format.
[Not in the body
of the email,
but as an
attachment].
TA feedback is
incorporated in
presentation.
89-
80
*Vast majority of questions Insightful, significant, thought
provoking,
*Attended to intersectionality in a thoughtful, attentive manner.
*Extended analysis to current issues or topics.
*Presenters demonstrated strong knowledge of materials.
*Presentation furthered student comprehension.
5 analytical questions, concluding question that used time effectively (35-
40 minutes of useful, significant discussion).
*All readings attended to thoughtfully.
*Presenters demonstrated an acute awareness of maintaining class
discussion; maintained the majority of class discussion.
*Handout to classmates had only minor errors & enhanced learning.
79-
70
*Significant number of questions were insightful, thought provoking,
however evident space for improvement.
*Attempted to address intersectionality.
*An attempt to connect topics to current issues or topics.
*Presenters demonstrated a solid comprehension of materials.
*Clear structure beginning with brainstorming questions, 2-5 analytical
questions, concluding question that generally used time effectively.
*All readings attended to.
*Presenters demonstrated an awareness of maintaining class discussion
and attempted to do so.
*Handout to class had several errors & complemented learning.
69-
60
*Limited attention to creating insightful, thought provoking
questions.
*Little attention to intersectionality.
*Limited connection to current issues or topics.
*Presenters demonstrated a limited comprehension of materials.
*Basic structure adhered to beginning with brainstorming questions, 2-5
analytical questions, concluding question.
*Time used somewhat effectively but ‘holes’ in the flow of the
presentation.
*All readings attended to but unequal attention or not all readings
addressed.
*Presenters demonstrated a limited awareness of maintaining class
discussion.
*Handout to classmates was completed but with multiple errors and did
not enhance learning.
with brainstorming questions, 2-5 analytical questions, concluding question
that used time effectively (35-40 minutes of useful, significant discussion).
*Clear, well organized structure beginning with brainstorming questions, 2-
Presenters: Dea Kukuqani & Faith Nickel
Date &Topic: January 25, 2018 & Mediated Images of Women Seminar #: 2 Grade: ___/50 (5% of final)
Document Summary
Date &topic: january 25, 2018 & mediated images of women seminar #: 2. *presenters offered a keen and well versed comprehension of materials. *a deeper comprehension of materials was evident following the discussion. *vast majority of questions insightful, significant, thought provoking, *attended to intersectionality in a thoughtful, attentive manner. *significant number of questions were insightful, thought provoking, however evident space for improvement. *an attempt to connect topics to current issues or topics. *limited attention to creating insightful, thought provoking questions. *extremely clear, well organized, and highly coherent structure beginning with brainstorming questions, 2-5 analytical questions, concluding question that used time effectively (35-40 minutes of useful, significant discussion). *presenters demonstrated an acute awareness of maintaining class discussion and demonstrated superb time management. *handout to classmates was superb; no errors & enhanced learning (apa format no errors) *clear, well organized structure beginning with brainstorming questions, 2- 5 analytical questions, concluding question that used time effectively (35-
