Class Notes (835,539)
Canada (509,225)
Law (1,967)
LAWS 1000 (529)
Amy Conroy (29)
Lecture

Laws 1000 Fall Term Notes

11 Pages
70 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Law
Course
LAWS 1000
Professor
Amy Conroy
Semester
Fall

Description
Law Notes September 16th Types, Functions & Dysfunctions of Law, PowerPoint notes  The law has a difficult job into taking into account everyone's different interests and beliefs that change day to day. Must be specific in informing people of what rights they have, but can't be too specific because the law loses its ability to be shaped to the situations that present themselves.  Interests will grow in number as the society gets larger. Some interests will always be minority interests. How to protect a minority interest when simple concepts like majority rules would see those interests as suppressed. Take into account and in cooperate ways of allowing and upholding those minority interests. Needs more complex ways of creating the law than just a majority rule vote.  Greater competition for the goods you may want as an individual and you may need to learn and follow how to get them. Typically something that is done through earning and spending money. Which tends to lead to inequity. Competition for the provision of those goods, laws required to protect consumer and businesses trying to compete. Technology progresses, interest needed to be balanced, therefore creating laws becomes even more difficult.  Need formal structure that takes into account numeral people with different goals, financial abilities, interests etc.  Prospect for conflict thus increases. (views, values, rights, beliefs etc)  Make a decision between two rights which can both be very convincing Ex: the right to presumption of innocence, overall rights to a fair trial vs. Public Safety (group right/interest)  Draft/Amend/Process to amend/courts etc. is information and forces working in background of creating such laws  The aim when these laws are being created/amended take into account in any society, the laws or the framework that are supposed to regulate conduct of individual, reflect the societal values, aims and economic/political climate of the time  Laws operate in imperfect ways  To what extend to we want the law to protect an individual, looking for a balance that is not easy to achieve  The law has to change with times, with people and society changing their minds or as a whole. Situation where interests may often collide and cannot achieve a specific answer  Common law; statutes enacted by Parliament, rules brought in by courts  Strengths and weakness in every approach of law  Certainty in law is needed because if its structured properly than it will have some predictability. But cannot be too specific  Predictability is important in law because everyone needs to know the rules that they are supposed to be living by. SO we don't have to go to court and have the rules read out to us and unaware of them.  Finality is important in law so decisions can be final, if you are named innocent, finality should follow so you should move on. The last stop in the court is the Supreme Court of Canada .  Balance in law  Do you consider the law as what the courts will do? Or something else.  It's very difficult to define what the law is, can be defined with value and flaws just like the legal firm work itself.  Custom: shaking hands, can never do it again but it is not the law. Connected but not the law.  Convention: different steps when signing off on bills/ parliament- obi by, but not set in case law that if this is not done it's illegal. Follow them and would be problematic to not do so.  Features of the law: satisfactory ways of describing what the law is and defining its basic characteristics, all up to debate Ex: recycling- no cohesion requiring us all to take care of environment, still do it, can get fined, but doesn't fit into Weber's definition on law  Understanding what's expected and the consequences that will follow if one does not follow the rules  Everyone has biases, influenced by emotions, different values, different conclusions can be reached by judges because of the different perspectives on that case. Human minds allow the law to operate. Can be in some cases a strength or a vulnerability  Without understanding the psychology of decision making , we won't understand how human act can act as frailty to law or benefit  Takes a long time to change or modify a law because of finality and predictability. If we don't look at outside forces, then we won't understand how law moves and what the underline forces are  Law has been in action, not in courts, but in greater discussion  Sociological trends help us understand the law because observing society can make sure whether the law is working or not. When updating laws, we are sure we are making progress and not going back  Enforce charter rights against the government  Substantive law; the content as the actual law, what is says you have as a right and obligation. What the law actually requires of us, what rules are we required to follow  Procedural law; fairly formal, lists of rules followed, objectivity and fairness of how law is administered  Public law; include the rules and rights set out in Charter, administrative decisions that gov. has to take, what they have to consider and what they cannot consider. (crim law)  Private law; enter into contract (dispute), family law (divorce)  Civil law; Become liable for the wrongs, not culpable.  Criminal Law; State September 23rd  There are primary sources of law and secondary (discuss and explain primary sources)  Incentives for Lawmaking Activity o has to be broad enough to cover what it needs to cover, take into account (changes in tech, moral view, diversity, minority) Any voice that highlights any issues that needs to be considered in law making process can be seen as incentive in the law decision process. o Ex: Academic scholarship; guidance for what has to be considered in law making process, academics will write articles that high light issues that have to be taken into account  Interest group ability to change the law is related to if its an defensive or offensive position. The law is difficult to change and this can be good. (combination of time, energy and enough of resources) can also use this to keep status quo. Sometimes it is easier to keep status quo then to change the law.  Public opinion is not always a fair process o law makers could be affected could be indirect or direct. Media: when it comes to law making, the media info is the forefront of every citizen and • every lawmaker. Might present facts that are consumed by readers and affects the way we see situations that need to be addressed in the law. RATWhere stories are placed in the paper, feels more important if on front page, or if it reoccurs in paper day by day. Strong influence in lawmaking process • Rationalistic Model: sets up boundaries the way society needs them to, simple way to enforce expectations • Functionalist Model: law adapts and doesn’t set out requirements, just models what the norms portray as acceptable behaviour. • Conflict: mechanism for conflict resolution, law will be amended as more conflicts come forward • Moral Entrepreneur: law will progress as morals view of society progress, sometimes law will be ahead to formalize those changing views • Parliament has supreme authority, courts are obliged to look at those statues and apply • CANADIAN LAW IS BUILT ON PRECEDENT *** (Judges have to look to what was decided in other case, if law has already been created, judge is supposed to follow it). • ratio** (principle that underlines decision) , obiter ** • Application of precedent is very complex, if theres similar facts in course from fact, supreme court might change common law September 30th • The criminal law is meant to define the interaction between individual, put boundaries on how one can behave, things one can and can’t do while relating and co existing with people in society. Prohibits certain actions. • Overtime as our morals change the criminal law is used to redefine those boundaries. Must be viewed as continuously evolving. State agent, judges, prosecutors, prison officials, media, everyday citizens etc enforce the criminal law. (Party to these proceedings-answering questions, reporting-less formal presence but part of that structure.) Criminal law addresses issues and give effect to the rules through various steps. • The State wants to be such a crucial part of criminal law because to protect itself society and legitimize its authority. • If there was no criminal law, people would take matters into their own hands which could go various ways. Reflect societal process • • The overall structure of crim law can be used to take an activity outside of the relm in our minds of crim behaviour and place into something that needs to be put into treatment context. • Criminal Proceedings: • Victorian era; The criminal proceedings were seen as being between victim and defendant, the victim was responsible for bringing to the court system and bringing to light the behaviour that could be classified as criminal, reinforcing that behaviour was wrong by bringing to court. Crimes existed, but it was for the victim to take control of situation, to not only report crime but enforce criminal law and sanctions. • Now; we see criminal proceeding being between State and defendant. Victim might support state in pursuing charge but it’s all under control of State. Victim can go to civil court but thus not being inside criminal arena. In terms of using crim law to enforce behaviour, victim is left at mercy of State. • In end of 17th Century, there was a limited right to defence council, only in the case of treason charges-specific crimes against king were the biggest crimes that could be committed in society. The state would take it upon themselves to pursue that charge. In that limited circumstance, the defendant had some right to a defence council. Outside of those charges there was very little defensive councils. • In 18th Century, things started to slowly change, the accused felon could consult lawyer for advice but still had to come to court and present any defence by himself. Individuals were meant to represent themselves against. The proceedings would take minutes or up to half an hour, judges had a lot of authority to determine what sanctions had to be and what crim law said, the decisions weren’t transferred from one court to another. A lot of variability between cases. Large emphasis on defendant’s credibility. Part of the reason why there was no defence council (state wasn't existing on other side so no perception of imbalance) the response of defendant was so crucial so if there was defence council they couldn’t tell. In middle 18th Century, saw changes in defence council, started to become increasingly • obvious there was an imbalance so slowly they decided something needed to change in the criminal system. Needed balance of authority to contest charge on other side. Small steps overtime brought us to what we have today where the prosecution is done • completely by state, defence is fully accomplished by a defence council-it is a well known right. There are now various defendant rights,including a presumption of innocence. Standards of proof, including guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” • Criminal Prohibitions on Aboriginal Dance Late 19th century, the colonial government wanted to prohibit Aboriginal Dance because • there was a wide and general policy of assimilation. The first criminal law prohibiting such things was seen in criminal code in 1884-this law remained intact until 1951. It’s obvious that we see Canadian gov. using the criminal law tool to shape social behaviours, shows how powerful this tool is. • Birth Control and Abortion in Late 19th Century Canada Birth rate was declining which was worrisome to the government. Woman were viewed • responsible for this decline in birthrate (rise in abortion) and considered selfish for wanting to work or not wanting kids. It was said that a woman’s reason to be alive was to give birth, when not followed-considered selfish. Thus being way abortion (condoms and birth control ad any kind of conceptions, advertisement about abortion) became a criminal act. • Up until 1969 were considered a criminal offence. The law and abortion was reformed so that in very limited circumstances a woman could receive abortion in
More Less

Related notes for LAWS 1000

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit