PHIL 2003 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Explanandum And Explanans, Iceberg

• School: Carleton University
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: PHIL 2003
• Professor: Ken Ferguson

Document Summary

From what are not arguments: recognizing arguments, there are some things that look like arguments even though they are not arguments: they may contain logical indicators, and they might even appear persuasive. But they are still not arguments: this can cause much confusion b/c we end up trying to find premises and (cid:272)o(cid:374)(cid:272)lusio(cid:374), a(cid:374)d so fo(cid:396)th, (cid:449)he(cid:374) the(cid:396)e a(cid:396)e(cid:374)(cid:859)t a(cid:374)(cid:455). O it helps to ha(cid:448)e a list of these things: things that look like, but are not, arguments, reports, some passages will merely describe things or events. Sprawling urban corridors challenged older cities as sites for commercial development. Rapid technological change fueled the growth of glo(cid:271)alized i(cid:374)dust(cid:396)ies. (cid:863: unsupported claims, sometimes a passage will simply put forward certain claims without providing any support. Ex: (cid:862)i (cid:271)elie(cid:448)e it is (cid:374)ot d(cid:455)i(cid:374)g that people a(cid:396)e af(cid:396)aid of. O(cid:373)ethi(cid:374)g else, something more unsettling and more tragic than dying frightens us. This complexity can make them look like arguments.