PSYC 2100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Crossmodal, Appeasement, Ethical Decision

• School: Carleton University
• Department: Psychology
• Course: PSYC 2100
• Professor: Jordan Schoenherr

Document Summary

You may not always want the emotion there (anxiety, depression)- there is no goal. Prosod(cid:455): ho(cid:449) (cid:449)e"re sa(cid:455)i(cid:374)g the (cid:449)ords, the e(cid:373)otio(cid:374) i(cid:374) the (cid:449)ords. It might not be our goal as an individual. There is a lot of cultural and personal biases, it is very difficult for us to separate our emotions. Example: it is okay for a man to be angry, but not to cry. E(cid:373)otio(cid:374)s are(cid:374)"t just a ph(cid:455)siologi(cid:272)al respo(cid:374)se, it also has so(cid:272)ial (cid:272)o(cid:373)po(cid:374)e(cid:374)ts- it is socially unacceptable for a male to be sad so they supress those emotions. In western society, we see emotions as the e(cid:374)e(cid:373)(cid:455), the do(cid:374)"t help us thi(cid:374)k, the(cid:455) (cid:373)ake us irrational. Descartes error: to engage in rational thought we need to have emotional responses. Example: people will emotional respo(cid:374)ses (cid:272)a(cid:374)"t (cid:373)ake ratio(cid:374)al de(cid:272)isio(cid:374)s. Experiencing positive and negative affect at the same time (can be high- job interview, or low- feeling neutral) Ambivalence is specifically high negative and positive affect.