LAWG 100D2 Lecture Notes - Lecture 29: Breaking The Chain

• School: McGill University
• Department: Law General
• Course: LAWG 100D2
• Professor: Helge Dedek

Document Summary

We notice language with regard to the fairness of imputing liability in the defendant for the damage in the given case. These words need to lead to the results we expect and want. In qc. , we use direct and immediate (vs. foreseeability in the cml). It is sort of behind the notion of causalit juridique. We notice here that eu general principle incl. both foreseeability as well as direct and immediateness. No idea what the conclusion of this part of class was. Review dorset yacht, deguire v. adler, minto management, and caneric properties v. allstate. Today, might still be found that having master keys in the first place: we also do not have it in deguire. makes the injury foreseeable. The faults come together in this case (although we are not looking at joint fault). They might aw well have happened at the same time as they come together to produce the damage.