Class Notes (838,229)
Canada (510,777)
POLI 243 (112)
Mark Brawley (109)
Lecture

Japan's monetary policy

8 Pages
114 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 243
Professor
Mark Brawley
Semester
Winter

Description
Japan and International Monetary Cooperation The Plaza and Louvre Accords 03/04/2013 12:35:00 ← Conflict between the US and Japan • Historically the yen had been undervalued o US encouraged them to undervalue currency to be more successful at exporting goods/not buying goods from US o Japan and West Germany fix a low exchange rate: built-in competitive edge in trade • As with South Korea, this boosted exports o Industries become more successful, majority of trade • “Nixon Shocks” 1971 – led to inflation o US could handle it in 50s/60s, but not later on o Stopping Bretton Woods: fixed exchange rates, no promises o Oil shock due to OPEC embargo – increased cost of transportation; lost confidence in money with no backing, invest in assets (gold, art) • US (Federal Reserve) monetary policy shifted in the late 1970s o Find new balance between confidence and liquidity o Manipulate domestic interest rate – tight money supply  Higher interest rate to borrow money – less purchases, slowed economy  Convince people that inflation is over = long-term policy o Loose fiscal policy to stimulate economic growth (Reagen)  Government spends money, borrows at high interest which increases debt • The higher dollar damaged American trade o Value of the dollar rises over other currencies o American firms cannot sell goods at such expensive value o Advantage for other countries – their goods look cheap in US  Japanese goods come into the market, outsell US goods • As trade deficit rose, Japan became focal point o Japan made manufactured goods that were just as good • Demands within the US for action grew stronger in the mid-1980s – but using which policy? o Automobile manufactures, labor unions visit Congress o Monetary policy? Industry specific trade policies?  Trade policy helps certain people specifically, but monetary policy affects everyone • US preferred change in monetary policy over trade conflict o Government doesn’t want to engage Japan at that time o Uruguay rounds for GATT need to be successful o Want to threaten Japan: Congress vs Executive ← ← American Actions • “Talking the dollar down” to a “soft landing” o Successfully ended inflation how to restart economy o Easing up on interest rate means the value of the dollar drops o Let the dollar drop in value, but only a little, and warning people. Easing it down, gradually.  Exchange rate decrease will solve trade problems • Was this a ploy, or genuine bureaucratic struggle (Federal Reserve versus Treasury) o FR – slow decrease of exchange rate in interest of the nation o Treasury – owe allegiance to President, needs economy to recover, want accelerated money flow o Bureaucratic politics – different responsibilities (elected versus nation interest) o Both agree for the need of the soft landing – trying to fine- tune the interest of the public • Result: coordinated exchange rate interventions, under floating exchange rates o Japan brought currency down to US level to keep advantage o US push market in one direction, Japan goes the other way o Work with other country governments to help each other’s policies – but no institutional setting • Ad hoc management of policies o Creating meeting to discuss coordination of policies • Desire to get economic recovery underway too o Exchange rate + stimulation of economies ← ← The Accords • The Plaza Accord: Sept 1985 • Finance ministers from the G5: US, Japan, Britain, West Germany, France (main economies of IMF) • Coordination of domestic policies needed • Japan and West Germany don’t need stimulus package  different problems then the US • The Louvre Accord: February 1987 • G5 plus Canada are involved • Coordinating exchange rates to drop US dollar value, rise in other values versus the dollar, helping all economies • Japan agrees to rise in yen’s value, plus promises to increase domestic spending o Pressure from US (systemic)? Action of Finance Ministry but who makes the decision? Domestic interest? ← Explain
More Less

Related notes for POLI 243

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit