PROC 124 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Bargaining Unit, Affirmative Action, Concurrent Jurisdiction
24 Jan 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Mandatory nature of rules re: to subject-matter jurisdiction (smj) Key points from thursday"s class: well-established principle w/ a bunch of concrete consequences, one rule is to prevent parties from contracting around the rules of smj, ex. E is suing for m, and e and b want to resolve dispute before cq, they can"t bc only the sc has jurisdiction bc monetary threshold of cq is set at k: provincial sc ( s. Politically interesting for qc gov"t: by increasing the $ threshold of cq, qc gov"t has increased its power over the appointment of judges: more civil cases are handled by provincially-appointed judges bc cq has more responsibility. So a need for more provincially-appointed judges: balance b/w ottawa and qc is somewhat upset here, it allows for more opportunities for gov"t to reward friends w/ judgeships at cq level. 1 sum claimed = ,000 (i. e.
