Class Notes (838,998)
Canada (511,162)
SOCI 265 (51)
Lecture 2

265 - Week 9 – Lecture 2 - Revolution .docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Sociology (Arts)
SOCI 265
John Anthony Hall

• The nature of revolution • Two texts today o Steven Walsh (sp?) article— international relations perspective o Michael Mann article about revolutions in general • What is a revolution? o In the original sense, it is a circle ending up in the same place (revolution of a wheel, for example) o Areturn to the same place o Classic definition of revolution—very much like one that Mann uses to begin his argument  Afundamental removal of the regime normally with violence, normally with the complete removal of the previous ruling class, involving some measure of popular participation from below, leading to some social transformation.  American revolution—political, but no real change in social structure. o Also, must consider the image of the revolution  Toqueville—what was France before the revolution? • An absolutist regime that was trying desperately to rule France from the centre by installing its own agents, bypassing the upper class  What is France after the revolution? • Even MORE centralized… • Napoleon: I can tell you what every school child is studying at this moment  T’s point: revolutions don’t necessarily change much. Sometimes they complete what was begun before the revolution • France, even more centralized • Russia: organizations fully wiped out under Bolsheviks  So Toqueville argues you’ll have more change if you have a series of small changes rather than revolution • Afew propositions o Revolutions are only possible when there is a state breakdown • 1.) Revolutions are the CONSEQUENCE of state breakdown o Consider the great revolutions…  French Rev • French state absolutely bankrupt o Impossible for Louis 14th to control the situation o Has to call the states general  This starting the airing of grievances, and things heat up o Then, no money to pay troops o Nobody to put down popular movements o Bread riots • Increasing levels of feeling • revolution due to inability of state to control  Russian Revolution • State breakdown due to war o Armies being destroyed by Germans. o Armies coming home and there’s no food o Armies don’t want to fight for the state anymore.  Only people left fighting for the state is his White Guard. o So again, had to call a summit. Things getting more heated. o Couldn’t control the situation. o Revolution consequence of state breaking down  China: • State had been pretty strong—destroyed first communist revolution… • But, invasion by Japan means Chinese communists can claim the nationalist card. o So revolution a consequence of war  Either due to bankruptcy or direct consequences o If the political regime you live under is inclusionary, relatively liberal, then you will not be politically radicalized. o You have the right to vote in it. Citizenship rights. o Have unions, but the state is theirs. o Other extreme: situation when you’re completely excluded. o Can’t organize a trade union. Living under an authoritarian or autocratic regime o Idea is that social movements take on the social character of the state with which they interact o The more a state interferes with you, the more likely you will to be politicized. o Inclusion diminishes things, exclusion radicalizes things • 2.) There are revolutionaries. Why and where do they come from?  The answer is most often that political revolutionary feelings come from being excluded in society. Not being allowed in.  In French case, most revolutionaries were highly educated lawyers, etc. • French society was a caste system • Revolutionaries wanted to have a voice, but they had no capacity to have a voice. • If you have a voice in society, you will be loyal to that society.  State breakdown causes revolutions through state breakdown • But if the state has been exclusionary in the past, it doubly causes revolutions • By themselves, a group of revolutionaries cannot make a revolution. Must have a state breakdown.  Sometimes you have state breakdowns, but no revolutionary class. Without a real revolutionary class, you won’t get any REAL change. • In Europe, in 1989, when the communist state breaks down, there are no revolutionaries. Noticeable of the huge change is that post-communist era produced no ideas. No revolutions.
More Less

Related notes for SOCI 265

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.