Class Notes (839,550)
Canada (511,388)
SOCI 386 (9)
Lecture

jan 28th.docx

5 Pages
63 Views

Department
Sociology (Arts)
Course Code
SOCI 386
Professor
Marcos Ancelovici

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
Jan 28 th Political Process Theory (Tilly/Tarrow/McAdam) - Focuses on how movements operate over time - SMs as just another way of engaging in politics - Stress indigeneous resources of aggreived groups (resources brought by actors at the grassroots level) - Mobilization builds on preexisting networks and organizations as well as previous waves of protest - Focuses on political institutional environment of SMs- i.e. when government opposes labour, the cost of collective action is higher - Structure of polity will be main factor explaining emergence and decline of SMs - Core concept: political opportunity structure (POS) Political Opportunity Structure (POS) - Conditions that favour and constrain contentious collective action - Definitions: consistent but not necessarily formal or permanent- dimensions of political environment that provide incentives for collective action by affecting people’s expectations for success or failure - POS as a curvilinear phenomenon- if government is very open, there is no need to engage in disruptive tactics because the government is usually willing to sit at the table and negotiate- if it is too closed, people won’t engage in disruptive tactics because they’d get killed Static dimension: relatively stable- explains tactics 1) State strength (autonomy with respect to interest groups) 2) State strategy (negotiation vs exclusion) 3) Social cleavages (class cleavage) Dynamic dimension- explains emergence and decline of SMs 1) Opening/closure of the polity 2) Alignments 3) Elite cohesion 4) Allies 5) State behaviour 6) Threats (i.e. people joining tuition protests b/c of Bill 78, which threatened freedom of association) Framing- allows culture to enter into picture - Goffman, David Snow - How to turn passivity into action - Diagnosis- blame attribution, Prognosis- solution, Motivation- source of anger - Symbolic manipulation (i.e. pro-life vs pro-choice) - Socialization and discursive repertoire (i.e. in French repertoire, you don’t use the word “race” or you’re racist, in US it is used all the time) - Frame alignment- when frame used by group and frame accepted by society are the same, it is more likely mobilization will occur - Frame extension- i.e. redefining private as political, including more groups in the movement - Frame bridging-2 existing frames, then you connect them - Framing and coalition building - Movement specific frames and master frames (rights frame was specific to civil rights movement, then became a master frame used by a lot of movements) How and when do people manage to act collectively? - Preexisting organizations and networks (framing- grievances, identity, and networks) - Resources - Shift in the POS Cycles of Protest (Tarrow) - Temporality of protest - Expanding opportunities - Influence of movements on one another and on the POS - Early risers/initiator movements- pay a higher cost and provide a toolkit for later protests - Intensification and innovation - Transformation/expansion of the repertoire of action - Expansion of repertoire leads to diffusion of repertoire - At the end of the cycle of protest, there is a decline- due to exhaustion or cooptation, or certain actors engaging in violent protest thereby raising the cost of collective action for the group as a whole Critique of PPT - Explains variation in space and time and talks about when and how SMs occur, but not why - Assumes movements always target the state and are contained within its natural borders - Only really takes into account the US experience- may not be universal, may only work in liberal democracies or US - How do we measure the level of the opening and the change in expectations of actors? - POS identified after the fact and potentially tautological (may confuse cause and effect) - Too encompassing or too narrow - Contradictory ecidence that could refute their ideas - View institutions as mere arenas in which actors compete, when they provide openings and closings (a lot of institutions actually shape what people think) SMs and the Media - The powerful often make decisions in private and they don’t want the media to
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit