🏷️ LIMITED TIME OFFER: GET 20% OFF GRADE+ YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION →
Log in
HomeClass Notes1,200,000CA670,000

LABRST 1C03 Lecture 1: term 1 presentation grading rubric

67 views1 pages
31 May 2017
School
McMaster University
Department
Labour Studies
Course
LABRST 1C03
Professor
Stephanie Ross

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Grading rubric, tutorial presentation #1 soc1a06 fall term, dr. sandra colavecchia. You will be doing two presentations in this course (one presentation per term). This presentation is worth 5% of your final mark. Learning objectives: library research, critical reading of articles, summary of three peer- reviewed academic articles that you will be using for assignment #1. Description: in no more than 5 minutes present the central research questions and findings of three peer-reviewed sociological articles that you will be using for assignment #1. This presentation must be in your own words. Clearly describes the key questions and central findings. The objectives of the presentation were not met. Solid job of describing research questions and findings. Able to clearly describe questions and findings in own words.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

LABRST 1C03 Lecture 1: term 2 presentation grading rubric
LABRST 1C03 Lecture Notes - Total War, Classical Liberalism, Industrial Democracy
lavenderotter418
SOCI 2665 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: None Of The Above
greenjellyfish278

Related Questions

Beginning with the two opposing viewpoints on the topic of the moral permissibility of abortion explained in the text, complete and submit a short (750- to 1000-word) reflective research project in which you clearly state and defend a thesis on the topic. Your essay should make good use of the two articles from the text as well as two (2) of the assigned articles in the Abortion Review source linked in this module. The position you defend should be informed by a particular moral principle (moral principles were introduced in Module 1) and should make meaningful reference to the chapters from the textbook and the supplemental articles. You may also use additional academic resources. Be sure to cite all outside sources (including textbook readings, supplemental articles, and any additional research) used in developing your argument, using APA format. Your essay will be evaluated on your selection, interpretation, and application of the relevant moral principle (as well as the texts and articles that we have studied in this module) to support your argument. Evaluation of your word choice, spelling, and punctuation, as well as the organization of your essay, are included in the grade determination. Before you begin, please refer to the Reflection Essay rubric for comprehensive grading criteria. Finally, remember that while the empirical data and research are certainly relevant and important in this area, the thesis that you defend and the argument you submit are not empirical; you are developing and defending a normative argument about what is the morally correct position in this case. [

You must know who each of these people is and what events they refer to in these articles. (This is called research.)
WHAT ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO DO?

You have read 3 articles. You must summarize each one, using your own words - not lengthy quotes from the articles. These summaries should be about 2 paragraphs, not including any introductory comments. (In other words, stick to the important stuff.)
After you summarize the articles you should address the following issues:

How do these positions agree or disagree with each other?
How do these articles support, or refute (or something in between) the idea of Globalization, the growth, and role of international institutions?
What questions arise based on the viewpoints you read?
What information do you feel the writers of these articles (or the principal being interviewed) ignored, misrepresented or should have learned that would improve the content of the article(s)
HOW LONG SHOULD IT BE?

Long enough to cover the topic completely. (An excellent writer can probably do this in 3-5 well-written pages. Average college writers may need more pages. Poor writers will hand in 2-3 pages of poorly constructed incoherent stuff that assumes the reader can read what was in the writer's mind.)

The topics are the

Myth of Bretton Woods

General Instructions This essay should be 400-500 words in length. You must use correct spelling and proper mechanics. You must include citations and a reference list for any resources used at the end of this essay. It is expected that you will use one to two references for this essay topic. Essay #2 Studies of identical and fraternal twins have yielded some very interesting information on the genetic basis of behavioral traits. Read both of the following articles from the web, and then complete the assignment below. · Do our genes make us popular? From Scientific American http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/popularity-genes/ · Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart, from the Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research http://mctfr.psych.umn.edu/research/UM%20research.html Address the following questions in your essay: · What is most striking to you in the results presented in the two articles? · In the article on popularity, do you agree with the conclusion that there is a genetic basis to how popular people are? Explain why or why not. · In the twin studies, do you think that the behavioral similarities in identical twins raised apart from birth (like “the Jim Twins”) are due to inheritance? Explain why or why not. · Conclude by stating whether or not these two articles have changed the way that you think about genetics, and explain your answer.