PHILOS 1E03 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Foundationalism, Compatibilism, Reductionism

106 views35 pages

Document Summary

They have deceived many times in the past: example: seeing something in the distance that is closer/farther, mirage, eye witness testimony, although the senses sometimes deceive us about objects that are very small or distant, that doesn"t apply to my belief that i am here, sitting by the fire, wearing a winter dressing gown, holding this piece of paper in my hands, and so on. Radical skepticism arguments: we are unable to come up with evidence to disprove the skeptical scenarios about the world, if we cannot come up with ways to disprove them, we do not know much, therefore, we know nothing about what the world is like. Descartes" response: argues that i exist, and god exists, argues that god is not a deceiver, argues that a good god would not allow us to be deceived, concludes that our own senses must be generally reliable, and that we are able to distinguish when they are not.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents