Class Notes (835,600)
Canada (509,275)
Psychology (5,217)
PSYCH 1X03 (1,058)
Joe Kim (989)


6 Pages
Unlock Document

Joe Kim

Influence of Others 11/27/2011 4:20:00 PM Norman Triplett  Found that cyclists raced faster when competing against each other in a group, compared to when racing against the clock on an individual time trial.  Children also do this when there is not necessarily an award at the end.  Co-Actor o Another individual performing the same task.  Audience o A group of people watching an individual perform a task.  Social Facilitation o The increased performance that occurs in the presence of co-actors or an audience. o However, social facilitation is not true in all cases. It actually hindered performance on tasks such as learning nonsense syllables, completing a difficult maze, or solving complex math problems. Robert Zajonc  The presence of others increases your arousal.  How this heightened arousal affects your specific task to be performed. For simple tasks which you have mastered, performance is increased. For complex tasks, performance is hindered. Social Learning Theory  You learn appropriate behaviours by modeling and imitating the behaviours by modeling and imitating the behaviour of others.  From basic conditioning – because the behaviours you learn from others do not always require explicit reinforcement to develop. The Bobo Doll Experiment  Children were given a variety of toys to play with in a room. Adults would model either aggressive or passive play with the toys.  After viewing the adult model, the child went into a new playroom with a bobo doll and behaviour was recorded.  Results showed that children who had viewed the aggressive model were more likely to display aggressive behaviour. Conformity Norm Formation  Autokinetic Effect - In a pitch-black room you are asked if a small dot of light moves at the front of the room. It doesn‟t move, but you perceive it as moving because you mistake the movement of the image on your retina as actual motion of the light.  Responses will gradually converge with others despite the different starting points of the individual subjects. Asch‟s Stimuli  Individuals were seated in a room with a group of other individuals, they would see one sample line and three comparison lines, and would have to identify which of the comparison lines matches the standard.  Only one person (the sixth person) in the group was the subject. The other six are confederates of the experiment.  37% of all responses conformed to a clearly incorrect answer.  75% of subjects conformed to an incorrect answer on at least one trial. Normative Function  The role of others in setting norms or standards of conduct.  You follow these standards in fear of rejection by others for not conforming.  Example: Fashion trends and pop culture. Comparative Function  The role of others in providing information about an ambiguous situation. Decision Making The Risky Shift  The groups decisions were on average riskier than the mean decision of the individuals before the group discussion.  Individuals probability of success is 40%, where a group‟s probability is 30%. Group Polarization  Group decision making strengthens the original inclinations of the individual group members.  Suggests that decision making in a group tends to lead to more extreme views by strengthening the original inclination of the individual group members.  Group decision making seems to enhance national pride, negative racial and financial attitudes, and decision-making in juries. Groupthink  A group decision making environment that occurs when group cohesiveness becomes so strong it overrides realistic appraisals of reality and alternate opinions.  Often believe that they are unquestionably rights and all other groups are wrong.  Fail to critically test, analyze, and evaluate the ideas of the group.  To avoid groupthink: o Be impartial o Critical evaluation o Devil‟s advocate o Subdivide the group o Provide a second chance The Bystander Effect  For an individual to respond they must believe that the situation is an emergency and that a response is required. Collective Ignorance  When each individual in a group see nobody responding in a given situation, they conclude that the situation is not an emergency. Diffusion of Responsibility  In deciding whether we have to act, we determine that someone else in the group is more qualified. Social Loafing  Individuals seem to be less motivated when working in a group than when working alone.  Subjects pulled 18% less when they thought they were pulling in a group as compared to pulling alone. Obedience Milgram‟s Experiment  There is a strong tendency of obedience to authority, even if this power is limited.  Illustrates that you are not always an accurate judge of how you behave in a given situation.
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 1X03

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.