Class Notes (837,000)
Canada (509,985)
Psychology (5,219)
PSYCH 1X03 (1,058)
Joe Kim (989)

Lesson 11-Influence of Others 2.pdf

9 Pages
Unlock Document

Joe Kim

Influence of Others 2: Obedience: Milgram’s Experiment: • You are designated as the Teacher and the other subject is the Learner (who is actually a confederate in the study but you are unaware) The Learner is connected to chock electrodes while you as a Teacher quietly watch • • During the setup, the Learner casually mentions that he has a heart condition which raised your concerns, but the experimenter assures him that the shocks would do no permanent damage As the Teacher, you are taken into a different room (control room) and seated in front of a • console containing a row of some very serious looking switches. • Each switch is marked with a shock voltage ranging from 15 to 450 volts; to add to the effect, some of the switches have captions such as “slight shock”, “moderate chock” and “danger, severe shock.” • As Teacher, you are to read a list of word pairs to the Learner, who in turn must correctly respond with the second word in the pair. • To improve answers, the Learner will receive a shock for every incorrect answer; the shocks will progressively increase. • How long would you be able to do this? Even after hearing no response, would you be able to continue? • 65% of all subjects continued until the very end of the experiment delivering a shock labeled “Danger, High Voltage” to a non-responsive man with a heart condition.
 ▯ ▯ ▯ 
 ▯ Important Lessons: There is a very strong tendency of obedience to authority, even if this power is limited. • • You are not always an accurate judge of how you would behave in a given situation. • Most subjects were emotionally devastated by the experience (ethics was a major factor).
 ▯ Manipulations: • One possible explanation for the extraordinary degree of obedience observed was the inherent prestige with following the directions of a faculty member at Yale University. • From an actual study room, to a rundown office, switching from professor to undergraduate student all decreased the rate of obedience • Another thing is that subjects continued to obey because they were separated from the Learner • The closer in proximity that the Teacher was to the Learner, the less likely the Teacher was to continue • Final factor influencing obedience was proximity of the Experimenter to the Teacher • If ordered by phone, only 25% of subjects obeyed, in fact, a number of Teachers “cheated” by delivering shocks of lower intensity than required
 ▯ Obedience in the Real World: • Milgram’s experiment demonstrated obedience in a lab settings, how does this apply to real life situations? • Hofling + colleague: Man posing as doctor calls a real nurse and states that he is on his way to the hospital to asses a patient and instructs her to administer a high dosage of a fake drug to the patient (confederate). • However, she would be breaking several rules. • The man is a complete stranger, the dosage is more than instructed the max is on the bottle, the drug is not on the official list of medications and medication orders should never be taken over the phone. Nurses said that they would never obey these orders but 21 out of 22 did. • • First, your tendency to obey can be irresistible under a variety of circumstances. • Second, you can never quite know how you would act until you are placed in a given situation.
 ▯ Cognitive Dissonance: Attitudes and Behaviour: • When you conform to a group, obey a command, or follow a social convention; you are performing a behaviour that is not necessarily in the line with your attitudes. • Can your chosen behaviour affect your attitudes? This is called Cognitive Dissonance. Cognitive Dissonance: • You are asked to participate in an experiment that was stated to be exciting but you leave extremely bored. • You are then told to talk to the next participant and tell them how exciting it was and you are either given $1 or $20 to lie to the next person; you are then asked to fill out a questionnaire about how you really felt about the experiment. • Reason why the $1 group rated the experiment higher in enjoyment is due to C.D. • Each subject subconsciously asks themselves “why did I tell the next subject that this experiment was exciting?” because they actually believes the experiment to be boring, but told the subject that it was fun, there is an inconsistency between their attitudes and behaviour. • This inconsistency produces an uncomfortable feeling called dissonance. • To reduce feelings of dissonance, there is an adjustment in attitude to be in line with active behaviour. • And so, the subjects change their attitudes to match their behaviour and decide to themselves that the experiment was more interesting than they initially thought. • Subjects paid $1 will rate the experiment much higher than the ones paid $20. • When $20 asked themselves why they lied to next group, they say they did it for the money, feeling no dissonance because there is no conflict between attitudes and behaviour. • Their attitude is intace and they can go on believing that the experiment was boring and their inconsistent behaviour is explained by the motivation of the large $20 reward. • For cognitive dissonance to take place, there must be insufficient justification for a behaviour in conflict with the attitude.
 ▯ ▯ ▯ Overjustification E
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 1X03

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.