LAW 122 Lecture 4: Lecture 4

• School: Ryerson University
• Department: Law and Business
• Course: LAW 122
• Professor: Avi Weisman

Document Summary

Although the company lost a lot of money when many of its customers were persuaded to buy elsewhere, the boycott organizers (cid:449)e(cid:396)e (cid:374)ot lia(cid:271)le. The (cid:272)ou(cid:396)t held that the p(cid:396)otesto(cid:396)s" (cid:373)ai(cid:374) pu(cid:396)pose (cid:449)as (cid:374)ot to hurt the company, but rather to raise public awareness of a political issue: the tort of conspiracy raises difficult issues, both legally and ethically. If the defe(cid:374)da(cid:374)ts" a(cid:272)tio(cid:374)s (cid:449)e(cid:396)e othe(cid:396)(cid:449)ise lawful, then conspiracy is difficult to establish because the (cid:272)ou(cid:396)t (cid:449)ill (cid:396)e(cid:395)ui(cid:396)e p(cid:396)oof that the defe(cid:374)da(cid:374)ts" p(cid:396)i(cid:373)a(cid:396)(cid:455) pu(cid:396)pose (cid:449)as to hu(cid:396)t the plaintiff. The defendant, a trade union, was angry with him as a result of a labour dispute. The union threated the airline with an illegal strike unless it fired the plaintiff. In addition to suing the defendant in tort for inducing the breach of contract, the plaintiff can also sue the third party in contract for the actual breach: however, plaintiff cannot recover full damages under both actions.