PLG 510 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: The Residents, Ontario Superior Court Of Justice
4 Apr 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
The residents appealed to the board regarding a by-law that did not provide sufficient public notice or conducting a meeting. Town has an op that mentions the use of the by-law public notification as a strong requirement. They convinced the board that there was no intention to avoid a public hearing: they were under the impression that comments in a news article provided sufficient notice. Law: 34 of the planning act, 1983 s. s (12) The city knows they fucked up and they claim negligence to save their ass. This by-law is in clear violation of the the right for the public to know what these shaqupalle are doing behind closed doors. Cadillac development ltd. and city of toronto ontario. High court of justice 24th may 1973 (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1) Cadillac owns land in toronto under a low density residential use. After 1963 toronto was going to re-designate as high density.
