CRIM 131 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Drug Court, Traditional Courts In Malawi, Umbrella Organization

72 views11 pages
Lecture 7: Criminal Courts Monday 5th March
Chapter 7: The Structure and Operation of Criminal Courts
Play an important, multi-faceted role in Canada’s CJS
Activities remain kind of a mystery as the work that goes on in courts is less visible
than that of the police
Legal issues are more complex and workloads are harder (could potentially be impacted
by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms)
Must determine guilt or innocence of an accused, must ensure their rights
Imposing sentences and that it is appropriate (follows guidelines and rights)
Falls under due process model, protect individuals rights
Crime funnel: a lot of people that come in contact in this point can be dismissed, can occur for
example with the use of diversion programs
Judicial independence- principle in which the courts work under. Citizens have the right
to have their own cases tried by tribunals that are fair, impartial, and immune from
political interference
No uniform court system in Canada
Four levels of court that deal with criminal cases (except Nunavut):
1. Provincial and territorial courts
2. Provincial and territorial superior courts
3. Provincial and territorial appellate courts
4. Supreme Court of Canada (highest court of all jurisdictions)
Most frequently heard cases in criminal court:
Impaired driving
Theft
Common assault
!1
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Tend to review the most ‘boring’ but common cases
Provincial and Territorial Court System
Lowest level of court (nearly all cases begin and end here)
Judges are provincially or territorially appointed
Composed by a ‘bench’, bench trial
Bench trials- trials that are not heard by the jury, other levels of court have option to get
either a bench trial or a jury trial
No juries
Have jurisdiction over most criminal offences, traffic violations, and provincial or territorial
regulatory offences
Judges in these courts are increasingly hearing more serious cases (may have preliminary
sentences)
House almost everything, however doesn’t mean that they are a unified system
Provincial and territorial specialized problem-solving courts
What is it? Specialized courts that are designed to divert offenders with special needs from the
CJS
Deal with almost all criminal cases
Oversee youth, statute violations, and give entry to many cases as preliminary hearings
occurs at provincial courts
Defining attributes:
1. Addressing underlying problems of offenders, victims, and the community
2. Interagency and interdisciplinary collaboration
3. Accountability to the community
Shift to treatment and rehabilitation
Incorporate therapeutic justice- use of law and authority of the court as change agents
in promoting the health and well-being of offenders while ensuring their legal rights are
protected and that justice is done
Eligibility criteria can vary (depending on seriousness of offence, etc.)
Shift in Courts
Has shifted over the year
Understanding that not all offenders are alike
Offenders based on case type, condition type, etc. might need specialized treatment
Mentally ill offenders, Drug addicts have better outcomes if treated and seen by specialists
Process departs from adversarial system but it tends to be more informal
Uses a specialized, problem-solving, team-based approach
Specialized courts try to specialize on the roots of the problem (therapeutic jurisprudence)
Involved staff are called agents of change
Emphasis on dialogue
Similar to restorative justice
Focus on support and assistance instead of shame and blame
Lack of resources and research to evaluate them
High rates of non-completion
Advocation for a Unified Family Court (not an official specialized court)
!2
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Recognizes that family as a unit isn’t immune to repercussion in their daily life
Judge that oversees a ruling in one thing, oversees the ruling in everything
Drug Treatment Courts (DTC)
Alternative forum for offenders with drug-related offences
Non-adversarial with attempt to link suspects with treatment programs and services
Avoid incarceration by agreeing to specific conditions
DTC cases are determined by the Crown counsel
Traditional roles played in court are altered in DTC
Relapses must be reported
Failure to abide with conditions sends offenders back to regular courts
Mental Health Court (MHC)
Reduce criminalization of persons with mental illnesses (operating and pre- and post-
charge stage)
Addressing this issue more urgent since deinstitutionalization
Concern is the absence of community-based resources
Participation is voluntary and offenders must accept guilt (excludes sexual offences)
Generally a very helpful program, however many dropout
Vancouver Downtown Community Court (DCC)
Addresses the need of residents in the Downtown Eastside area
Goal to reduce crime and recidivism
Also focuses on improving public safety and justice efficiencies
Effectiveness of Specialized Courts
High rates of non-compliance of conditions and non-completion of programs
Difficulty attracting Aboriginal communities
Still need of research to establish various relationships
Some research suggests this might be a good alternative to traditional courts
Most effective with dealing with reoffending when RNR principles are used
Traditional Courts
Problem-Solving Courts
Adversarial and Legalistic
Therapeutic and Restorative
Anonymous and Impersonal
Personalized
Little collaboration between agencies
Collaborative
Offence focused
Offender focused
Sanction focused
Problem focused
Generic supervision
Individualized supervision
Minimal community involvement
Community involvement
!3
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 11 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Chapter 7: the structure and operation of criminal courts. Play an important, multi-faceted role in canada"s cjs. Activities remain kind of a mystery as the work that goes on in courts is less visible than that of the police. Legal issues are more complex and workloads are harder (could potentially be impacted by the charter of rights and freedoms) Must determine guilt or innocence of an accused, must ensure their rights. Imposing sentences and that it is appropriate (follows guidelines and rights) Falls under due process model, protect individuals rights. Crime funnel: a lot of people that come in contact in this point can be dismissed, can occur for example with the use of diversion programs. Judicial independence- principle in which the courts work under. Citizens have the right to have their own cases tried by tribunals that are fair, impartial, and immune from political interference.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents