PHIL 1200H Lecture Notes - Lecture 19: Criminal Negligence, Ad Hominem

18 views1 pages

Document Summary

Many debates that are in this form. Argumentation calls on more structure in this area. P2: x"s views should be rejected because x is not knowledgeable, trustworthy, of free of bias. Ad hominem used to be viewed as strictly fallacy but can be correct. Straw figures can be found in ad hominem as representation of the person being attacked. Can be used to expose vested interest but can also be used to discredit the arguer. Insulting the arguer over an actual argument can be negative. Emotionally neutral sayings should be used to avoid fallacy. Poisoning the well is under investigation of ad hominem where you expose hidden premises and conclusions that make it difficult to argue in the future (poisoning the well from anyone else wants to drink from it) The alleged authority has questionable or irrelevant credentials. Can be similar to ad hominem to expose controversial credibility.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents