PHIL 1200H Lecture Notes - Lecture 22: Microsoft Powerpoint
4 Apr 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Identifying the sub conclusions in relation to the mc. Identifies sub arguments and whether they are well supported and the strength in relevancy to the mc. Asses the importance of problematic premises to the main conclusion. 8 minutes speaking time per team (approx four written pages, double spaced, 12 pt. font) Handed in for evaluation (no sub headers) You have freedom to submit a different argument. State the main reasons that support your thesis. Restate the thesis in light of your arguments. Restate your main supporting reasons in light of the arguments. Grading rubric: 1 (very weak); 5 (very strong) Clarity (all components of the argument claims, definitions, and reasoning. Should be clearly stated and free of problems with language). Organization (the argument should develop according to a logical structure). Objectivity (some attempt should be made to consider and respond to counter-positions). Originality (the better presentations will take an imaginative approach to the material).
