MBG 3060 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Mutation, Allele, Mutation Rate

82 views9 pages
Migration -influx of alleles
Selection -favorable alleles have increasing frequency
Mutation -creation of new alleles
Three factors that mess up Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium are migration,
selection and mutation which alter allele frequencies.
Movement of alleles from one population to the next
If allele frequencies are the same between two populations, migration
has no effect
Population 1: A=p1, a=q1
Population 2: A=p2, a=q2
--> population 1 after migration: p1'= mp2 + (1-m)p1 = p1 +
m(p2-p1)
M is the migration rate = proportion of the total combined number
of individuals in the new population 1 that came from population
2
Example:
M=5%=0.05
P1' = m(p2-p1) + p1 = 0.05(0-1) + 1 = 0.95
Q1= 1-p1' = 1-0.95 = 0.05
Ex. Wild population of squirrels are all black [f(B)=1, f(b)=0]. A
researcher releases grey squirrels [f(B)=0, f(b)=1] that make up 5% of
the population. Assuming colour is controlled by a single locus (B or b),
what is the frequency of the grey allele?
M = migrants
!
1-m = natives
!
Starting population: generation 0
Pure migrants = m^2
!
Mixed = (1-m)m
!
Pure natives = (1-m)^2
!
Population after one year of random mating:
Tracking proportion of individuals in combined population by origin:
M = (p1' -p1) / (p2-p1)
Calculating migration rate:
1p1= p1'
1p1 = 0p1 (1-m) + mp2
kp1 = k-1p1 (1-m) + mp2
If these are not constant calculate each generation separately
!
*m is assumed to be constant and the size of the native population
is assumed constant as a proportion
2p1 = 0p1 (1-m)(1-m) + [1-(1-m)(1-m)]p2
!
Note: p1 is decreased by a proportion of (1-m) in each generation
kp1 = 0p1 (1-m)^k + [1-(1-m)^k]p2
!
So, after k generations,
(1-m)^k = (kp1 - p2) / (0p1- p2)
!
Reordering, we get…
Continued migration on population allele frequency:
U=migration rate for males
!
V = migration rate for females
!
Pm2 = frequency for males in population 2
!
Pf2 = frequency for females in population 2
!
P1= 1/2 {[upm2 + (1-u)p1] + [vpf2 + (1-v)p1]}
P1= 1/2 {[20/70(1.0) + (1-(20/70))(.04)] + [0(1.0) + (1-0)
(0.04)]} = 0.177
!
*if not given number of M and F assume 50:50 ratio
!
Ex. P1=0.04 with a population of 50M and 50F--> bring in 20
males with p2 =1.0
Differential Migration by Gender
Migration
The degree to which a population responds to these environmental
pressures is usually proportional to the severity of the pressure
These rapid changes may put the population through a
"bottleneck" -event where only the fittest few survive
!
A gradual change (e.g. climate change) lets a population gradually
adapt and would be less likely to cause rapid changes in allele
frequencies compared to events like prolonged drought or an ice
age
The extreme example of natural selection is extinction where they
cannot adapt quickly enough
Natural Selection -process that changes allele frequencies in a wild
population
Notion of selection being intentional and driven by a human
decision making process
Artificial Selection -based on human intervention
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Genotypic frequency in
parents
P^2 2pq Q^2
Fitness of Genotypes wW(1-s1) W(1-s2)
*usually w=
1
(1-s1) (1-s2)
Genotypic frequency after
selection
P^2 2(1-s1)pq (1-s2)q^2
*s1 and s2 = selection proportion or the individuals eliminated
from the population
Fitness and Allele Frequency:
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Frequency P^2 2pq Q^2
Number 810 180 10
Fitness 1 1 0.1
After Selection 810 180 1
P' = 810/991 + 1/2(180/991) = 0.908
Change in P = 0.908-0.9 = 0.008
Example: startingp=f(A1)=0.9, q=f(A2)=0.1
P1 = [p0 (1-s1q0)] / [1-2*s1p0q0 -s2q0^2]
Total survivors = p0^2 + 2(1-s1)p0q0 + (1-s2)q0^2
P0=0.6, q0=0.4, s1=0.25, s2=0.50
!
P1 = 0.675 *using first equation above
!
Example:
Selection: One Preferred Genotype
AA: fitness=1
Aa: fitness = 1
'aa': fitness = 1-s
NOTE: if s=1, 'a' is a lethal recessive allele
Total survivors (aa) = 1 -q0^2
P1= p0/ (1-s*q0^2)
Selection Against 'aa'
AA Aa aa
Generation 0 P0^2 2pq Q0^2
Fitness 1 1 0
New Frequency P0^2 2p0q0 0
New Proportion P0^2/T 2P0q0 /T 0
AA Aa aa
Generation 1 P1^2 2pq Q1^2
Expressed as
f(q0)
1/ (1+q0)^2 2q0 / (1+q0)^2 Q0^2 /(1+q0)^2
Fitness 1 1 0
--> pn= [1 + (n-1)q0] / [1 + nq0]
Qn= q0/ (1+ nq0)
!
Pn= (1+ (n-1)q0)/ (1+ nq0)
!
When the aa genotype is lethal, the frequencies of the A and a
alleles in the n(th) generation as a function of the initial
frequencies are:
N = (1/qn) -(1/q0)
!
*n should always be rounded up
!
How to calculate 'n':
Selection over time -aa Lethal
AA Aa aa
Frequency 0.36 0.48 0.16
Fitness 10.75 0.5
F(A) = 0.36 + 0.75(0.48/2) = 0.54, F(a) = 0.75(0.48/2) +
0.5(0.16) = 0.26
Total = 0.54 + 0.26 = 0.8
P1= 0.54/0.8 = 0.675 , q1 = 0.26/0.8 = 0.325
Therefore, change in p = 0.675 -0.6 = 0.075
Ex. Let p=0.6, q=0.4 and s=0.5
Selection with Co-Dominance
If we select for Aa individuals, we won’t loose any alleles from
the population but if repeated over generations, we will eventually
reach equilibrium
AA Aa aa
Frequency P0^2 2pq Q0^2
Fitness 1-s1 1 1-s2
Selection for Heterozygotes
Selection
Selection Summary:
Gene Action Fitness Frequency of A Allele
Dominance, selection for
A_
AA: 1
Aa: 1
'aa': 1-s
P1= p0/ (1 -s*q0^2)
*pE--> fixed
Dominance, selection for
aa
AA: 1-s
Aa: 1-s
'aa': 1
P1= p0(1-s) / (1 -s*p0(1+q0))
*pE--> 0, A is lost
Codominance AA: 1
Aa: 1-
0.5s
'aa': 1-s
P1= p0(1-0.5sq0) / (1 -s*q0)
*pE--> fixed
Incomplete Dominance AA: 1
Aa: 1-s1
'aa': 1-s2
P1= p0(1-s1q0) / (1 -2s1*p0q0- s2q0^
2)
*pE--> fixed
Over-Dominance AA: 1-s1
Aa: 1
'aa': 1-s2
P1= p0(1-s1p0) / (1 -2s1*p0^2 - s2q0^
2)
*pE= s2/ (s2+ s1)
A --> a at a rate 'u'
'a'---> A at a rate 'v'
Change in P = v(1-p) -up
Change in Q = u(1-q) -vq
pE = v/(u+v)
!
qE = u/(u+v)
!
At equilibrium, change of p = change of q = 0
Defining mutation rates:
At equilibrium amount of mutation = selection (codominance)
Change in q = u(1-q) -vq = [sq^2 (1-q)]/ (1-sq^2)
-vq is "really small" -relatively unimportant
!
Sq^2 is inconsequential compared to 1 and simplifying
!
If q is small:
--> u(1-q) = sq^2 (1-q)
Therefore, q = sq.rt(u/s)
Mutation vs. Selection
Given mutation rate of A1-->A2 = 0.0001 with 's' against A2 = 0.1
Q = sq. rt. (0.0001/0.1) = 0.001 0.0316
Example:
Albino (aa): f(a)=qE=0.05, s=1
qE = 0.05 = sq. rt( u/1)
Therefore, u = 0.0025
Example:
Change of p = sq *if p is close to 1
If selection balances mutation, up=sq
!
But, when p is close to 1, up=u
!
So, u=sq and qE= u/s
!
Mutation rate u (A1-->A2) causes the change of p of u*p which
must equal the gain of change in p due to selection
With Incomplete Dominance:
Mutation
Let s1=0, s2=0.9
T = total individuals remaining
Then,
P1 = 1-q1 = 1 -(q0 / (1+q0)) = 1/ (1+q0)
= (1/2*.5*.6*.4) / (1 -.5*.4)
= 0.075
Change in P = (1/2*s*p0*q0)/(1 -s*q0)
Change in P = [pq(s2q -s1p)] / [1-(s1P^2) -(s2q^2)]
*if we reach equilibrium, change in p = 0
SO, pE = s2/(s1+s2) and qE = s1/(s2+s1)
3. Migration, Selection & Mutation
Saturday,*February*4,*2017
1:36*PM
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Migration -influx of alleles
Selection -favorable alleles have increasing frequency
Mutation -creation of new alleles
Three factors that mess up Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium are migration,
selection and mutation which alter allele frequencies.
Movement of alleles from one population to the next
If allele frequencies are the same between two populations, migration
has no effect
Population 1: A=p1, a=q1
Population 2: A=p2, a=q2
*population 2 migrates into population 1
--> population 1 after migration: p1'= mp2 + (1-m)p1 = p1 +
m(p2-p1)
M is the migration rate = proportion of the total combined number
of individuals in the new population 1 that came from population
2
Example:
M=5%=0.05
P1' = m(p2-p1) + p1 = 0.05(0-1) + 1 = 0.95
Q1= 1-p1' = 1-0.95 = 0.05
Ex. Wild population of squirrels are all black [f(B)=1, f(b)=0]. A
researcher releases grey squirrels [f(B)=0, f(b)=1] that make up 5% of
the population. Assuming colour is controlled by a single locus (B or b),
what is the frequency of the grey allele?
M = migrants
!
1-m = natives
!
Starting population: generation 0
Pure migrants = m^2
!
Mixed = (1-m)m
!
Pure natives = (1-m)^2
!
Population after one year of random mating:
Tracking proportion of individuals in combined population by origin:
M = (p1' -p1) / (p2-p1)
Calculating migration rate:
1p1= p1'
1p1 = 0p1 (1-m) + mp2
kp1 = k-1p1 (1-m) + mp2
If these are not constant calculate each generation separately
!
*m is assumed to be constant and the size of the native population
is assumed constant as a proportion
2p1 = 0p1 (1-m)(1-m) + [1-(1-m)(1-m)]p2
!
Note: p1 is decreased by a proportion of (1-m) in each generation
kp1 = 0p1 (1-m)^k + [1-(1-m)^k]p2
!
So, after k generations,
(1-m)^k = (kp1 - p2) / (0p1- p2)
!
Reordering, we get…
Continued migration on population allele frequency:
U=migration rate for males
!
V = migration rate for females
!
Pm2 = frequency for males in population 2
!
Pf2 = frequency for females in population 2
!
P1= 1/2 {[upm2 + (1-u)p1] + [vpf2 + (1-v)p1]}
P1= 1/2 {[20/70(1.0) + (1-(20/70))(.04)] + [0(1.0) + (1-0)
(0.04)]} = 0.177
!
*if not given number of M and F assume 50:50 ratio
!
Ex. P1=0.04 with a population of 50M and 50F--> bring in 20
males with p2 =1.0
Differential Migration by Gender
Migration
The degree to which a population responds to these environmental
pressures is usually proportional to the severity of the pressure
These rapid changes may put the population through a
"bottleneck" -event where only the fittest few survive
!
A gradual change (e.g. climate change) lets a population gradually
adapt and would be less likely to cause rapid changes in allele
frequencies compared to events like prolonged drought or an ice
age
The extreme example of natural selection is extinction where they
cannot adapt quickly enough
Natural Selection -process that changes allele frequencies in a wild
population
Notion of selection being intentional and driven by a human
decision making process
Artificial Selection -based on human intervention
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Genotypic frequency in
parents
P^2 2pq Q^2
Fitness of Genotypes wW(1-s1) W(1-s2)
*usually w=
1
(1-s1) (1-s2)
Genotypic frequency after
selection
P^2 2(1-s1)pq (1-s2)q^2
*s1 and s2 = selection proportion or the individuals eliminated
from the population
Fitness and Allele Frequency:
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Frequency P^2 2pq Q^2
Number 810 180 10
Fitness 1 1 0.1
After Selection 810 180 1
P' = 810/991 + 1/2(180/991) = 0.908
Change in P = 0.908-0.9 = 0.008
Example: startingp=f(A1)=0.9, q=f(A2)=0.1
P1 = [p0 (1-s1q0)] / [1-2*s1p0q0 -s2q0^2]
Total survivors = p0^2 + 2(1-s1)p0q0 + (1-s2)q0^2
P0=0.6, q0=0.4, s1=0.25, s2=0.50
!
P1 = 0.675 *using first equation above
!
Example:
Selection: One Preferred Genotype
AA: fitness=1
Aa: fitness = 1
'aa': fitness = 1-s
NOTE: if s=1, 'a' is a lethal recessive allele
Total survivors (aa) = 1 -q0^2
P1= p0/ (1-s*q0^2)
Selection Against 'aa'
AA Aa aa
Generation 0 P0^2 2pq Q0^2
Fitness 1 1 0
New Frequency P0^2 2p0q0 0
New Proportion P0^2/T 2P0q0 /T 0
AA Aa aa
Generation 1 P1^2 2pq Q1^2
Expressed as f(q0) 1/ (1+q0)^2 2q0 / (1+q0)^
2
Q0^2 /(1+q0)^
2
Fitness 1 1 0
--> pn= [1 + (n-1)q0] / [1 + nq0]
Qn= q0/ (1+ nq0)
!
Pn= (1+ (n-1)q0)/ (1+ nq0)
!
When the aa genotype is lethal, the frequencies of the A and a
alleles in the n(th) generation as a function of the initial
frequencies are:
N = (1/qn) -(1/q0)
!
*n should always be rounded up
!
How to calculate 'n':
Selection over time -aa Lethal
AA Aa aa
Frequency 0.36 0.48 0.16
Fitness 10.75 0.5
F(A) = 0.36 + 0.75(0.48/2) = 0.54, F(a) = 0.75(0.48/2) +
0.5(0.16) = 0.26
Total = 0.54 + 0.26 = 0.8
P1= 0.54/0.8 = 0.675 , q1 = 0.26/0.8 = 0.325
Therefore, change in p = 0.675 -0.6 = 0.075
Ex. Let p=0.6, q=0.4 and s=0.5
Selection with Co-Dominance
If we select for Aa individuals, we won’t loose any alleles from
the population but if repeated over generations, we will eventually
reach equilibrium
AA Aa aa
Frequency P0^2 2pq Q0^2
Fitness 1-s1 1 1-s2
Selection for Heterozygotes
Selection
Selection Summary:
Gene Action Fitness Frequency of A Allele
Dominance, selection for
A_
AA: 1
Aa: 1
'aa': 1-s
P1= p0/ (1 -s*q0^2)
*pE--> fixed
Dominance, selection for
aa
AA: 1-s
Aa: 1-s
'aa': 1
P1= p0(1-s) / (1 -s*p0(1+q0))
*pE--> 0, A is lost
Codominance AA: 1
Aa: 1-0.5s
'aa': 1-s
P1= p0(1-0.5sq0) / (1 -s*q0)
*pE--> fixed
Incomplete Dominance AA: 1
Aa: 1-s1
'aa': 1-s2
P1= p0(1-s1q0) / (1 -2s1*p0q0- s2q0^
2)
*pE--> fixed
Over-Dominance AA: 1-s1
Aa: 1
'aa': 1-s2
P1= p0(1-s1p0) / (1 -2s1*p0^2 - s2q0^
2)
*pE= s2/ (s2+ s1)
A --> a at a rate 'u'
'a'---> A at a rate 'v'
Change in P = v(1-p) -up
Change in Q = u(1-q) -vq
pE = v/(u+v)
!
qE = u/(u+v)
!
At equilibrium, change of p = change of q = 0
Defining mutation rates:
At equilibrium amount of mutation = selection (codominance)
Change in q = u(1-q) -vq = [sq^2 (1-q)]/ (1-sq^2)
-vq is "really small" -relatively unimportant
!
Sq^2 is inconsequential compared to 1 and simplifying
!
If q is small:
--> u(1-q) = sq^2 (1-q)
Therefore, q = sq.rt(u/s)
Mutation vs. Selection
Given mutation rate of A1-->A2 = 0.0001 with 's' against A2 = 0.1
Q = sq. rt. (0.0001/0.1) = 0.001 0.0316
Example:
Albino (aa): f(a)=qE=0.05, s=1
qE = 0.05 = sq. rt( u/1)
Therefore, u = 0.0025
Example:
Change of p = sq *if p is close to 1
If selection balances mutation, up=sq
!
But, when p is close to 1, up=u
!
So, u=sq and qE= u/s
!
Mutation rate u (A1-->A2) causes the change of p of u*p which
must equal the gain of change in p due to selection
With Incomplete Dominance:
Mutation
Let s1=0, s2=0.9
T = total individuals remaining
Then,
P1 = 1-q1 = 1 -(q0 / (1+q0)) = 1/ (1+q0)
= (1/2*.5*.6*.4) / (1 -.5*.4)
= 0.075
Change in P = (1/2*s*p0*q0)/(1 -s*q0)
Change in P = [pq(s2q -s1p)] / [1-(s1P^2) -(s2q^2)]
*if we reach equilibrium, change in p = 0
SO, pE = s2/(s1+s2) and qE = s1/(s2+s1)
3. Migration, Selection & Mutation
Saturday,*February*4,*2017 1:36*PM
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Migration -influx of alleles
Selection -favorable alleles have increasing frequency
Mutation -creation of new alleles
Three factors that mess up Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium are migration,
selection and mutation which alter allele frequencies.
Movement of alleles from one population to the next
If allele frequencies are the same between two populations, migration
has no effect
Population 1: A=p1, a=q1
Population 2: A=p2, a=q2
*population 2 migrates into population 1
--> population 1 after migration: p1'= mp2 + (1-m)p1 = p1 +
m(p2-p1)
M is the migration rate = proportion of the total combined number
of individuals in the new population 1 that came from population
2
Example:
M=5%=0.05
P1' = m(p2-p1) + p1 = 0.05(0-1) + 1 = 0.95
Q1= 1-p1' = 1-0.95 = 0.05
Ex. Wild population of squirrels are all black [f(B)=1, f(b)=0]. A
researcher releases grey squirrels [f(B)=0, f(b)=1] that make up 5% of
the population. Assuming colour is controlled by a single locus (B or b),
what is the frequency of the grey allele?
M = migrants
!
1-m = natives
!
Starting population: generation 0
Pure migrants = m^2
!
Mixed = (1-m)m
!
Pure natives = (1-m)^2
!
Population after one year of random mating:
Tracking proportion of individuals in combined population by origin:
M = (p1' -p1) / (p2-p1)
Calculating migration rate:
1p1= p1'
1p1 = 0p1 (1-m) + mp2
kp1 = k-1p1 (1-m) + mp2
If these are not constant calculate each generation separately
!
*m is assumed to be constant and the size of the native population
is assumed constant as a proportion
2p1 = 0p1 (1-m)(1-m) + [1-(1-m)(1-m)]p2
!
Note: p1 is decreased by a proportion of (1-m) in each generation
kp1 = 0p1 (1-m)^k + [1-(1-m)^k]p2
!
So, after k generations,
(1-m)^k = (kp1 - p2) / (0p1- p2)
!
Reordering, we get…
Continued migration on population allele frequency:
U=migration rate for males
!
V = migration rate for females
!
Pm2 = frequency for males in population 2
!
Pf2 = frequency for females in population 2
!
P1= 1/2 {[upm2 + (1-u)p1] + [vpf2 + (1-v)p1]}
P1= 1/2 {[20/70(1.0) + (1-(20/70))(.04)] + [0(1.0) + (1-0)
(0.04)]} = 0.177
!
*if not given number of M and F assume 50:50 ratio
!
Ex. P1=0.04 with a population of 50M and 50F--> bring in 20
males with p2 =1.0
Differential Migration by Gender
Migration
The degree to which a population responds to these environmental
pressures is usually proportional to the severity of the pressure
These rapid changes may put the population through a
"bottleneck" -event where only the fittest few survive
!
A gradual change (e.g. climate change) lets a population gradually
adapt and would be less likely to cause rapid changes in allele
frequencies compared to events like prolonged drought or an ice
age
The extreme example of natural selection is extinction where they
cannot adapt quickly enough
Natural Selection -process that changes allele frequencies in a wild
population
Notion of selection being intentional and driven by a human
decision making process
Artificial Selection -based on human intervention
A1A1
A1A2
A2A2
Genotypic frequency in
parents
P^2
2pq
Q^2
Fitness of Genotypes
w
W(1-s1)
W(1-s2)
*usually w=
1
(1-s1)
(1-s2)
Genotypic frequency after
selection
P^2
2(1-s1)pq
(1-s2)q^2
*s1 and s2 = selection proportion or the individuals eliminated
from the population
Fitness and Allele Frequency:
A1A1
A1A2
A2A2
Frequency
P^2
2pq
Q^2
Number
810
180
10
Fitness
1
1
0.1
After Selection
810
180
1
P' = 810/991 + 1/2(180/991) = 0.908
Change in P = 0.908-0.9 = 0.008
Example: startingp=f(A1)=0.9, q=f(A2)=0.1
P1 = [p0 (1-s1q0)] / [1-2*s1p0q0 -s2q0^2]
Total survivors = p0^2 + 2(1-s1)p0q0 + (1-s2)q0^2
P0=0.6, q0=0.4, s1=0.25, s2=0.50
!
P1 = 0.675 *using first equation above
!
Example:
Selection: One Preferred Genotype
AA: fitness=1
Aa: fitness = 1
'aa': fitness = 1-s
NOTE: if s=1, 'a' is a lethal recessive allele
Total survivors (aa) = 1 -q0^2
P1= p0/ (1-s*q0^2)
Selection Against 'aa'
AA
Aa
aa
Generation 0
P0^2
2pq
Q0^2
Fitness 1 1 0
New Frequency P0^2 2p0q0 0
New Proportion P0^2/T 2P0q0 /T 0
AA Aa aa
Generation 1 P1^2 2pq Q1^2
Expressed as f(q0) 1/ (1+q0)^2 2q0 / (1+q0)^2 Q0^2 /(1+q0)^
2
Fitness 1 1 0
--> pn= [1 + (n-1)q0] / [1 + nq0]
Qn= q0/ (1+ nq0)
!
Pn= (1+ (n-1)q0)/ (1+ nq0)
!
When the aa genotype is lethal, the frequencies of the A and a
alleles in the n(th) generation as a function of the initial
frequencies are:
N = (1/qn) -(1/q0)
!
*n should always be rounded up
!
How to calculate 'n':
Selection over time -aa Lethal
AA Aa aa
Frequency 0.36 0.48 0.16
Fitness 10.75 0.5
F(A) = 0.36 + 0.75(0.48/2) = 0.54, F(a) = 0.75(0.48/2) +
0.5(0.16) = 0.26
Total = 0.54 + 0.26 = 0.8
P1= 0.54/0.8 = 0.675 , q1 = 0.26/0.8 = 0.325
Therefore, change in p = 0.675 -0.6 = 0.075
Ex. Let p=0.6, q=0.4 and s=0.5
Selection with Co-Dominance
If we select for Aa individuals, we won’t loose any alleles from
the population but if repeated over generations, we will eventually
reach equilibrium
AA Aa aa
Frequency P0^2 2pq Q0^2
Fitness 1-s1 1 1-s2
Selection for Heterozygotes
Selection
Selection Summary:
Gene Action Fitness Frequency of A Allele
Dominance, selection for
A_
AA: 1
Aa: 1
'aa': 1-s
P1= p0/ (1 -s*q0^2)
*pE--> fixed
Dominance, selection for
aa
AA: 1-s
Aa: 1-s
'aa': 1
P1= p0(1-s) / (1 -s*p0(1+q0))
*pE--> 0, A is lost
Codominance AA: 1
Aa: 1-0.5s
'aa': 1-s
P1= p0(1-0.5sq0) / (1 -s*q0)
*pE--> fixed
Incomplete Dominance AA: 1
Aa: 1-s1
'aa': 1-s2
P1= p0(1-s1q0) / (1 -2s1*p0q0- s2q0^
2)
*pE--> fixed
Over-Dominance AA: 1-s1
Aa: 1
'aa': 1-s2
P1= p0(1-s1p0) / (1 -2s1*p0^2 - s2q0
^2)
*pE= s2/ (s2+ s1)
A --> a at a rate 'u'
'a'---> A at a rate 'v'
Change in P = v(1-p) -up
Change in Q = u(1-q) -vq
pE = v/(u+v)
!
qE = u/(u+v)
!
At equilibrium, change of p = change of q = 0
Defining mutation rates:
At equilibrium amount of mutation = selection (codominance)
Change in q = u(1-q) -vq = [sq^2 (1-q)]/ (1-sq^2)
-vq is "really small" -relatively unimportant
!
Sq^2 is inconsequential compared to 1 and simplifying
!
If q is small:
--> u(1-q) = sq^2 (1-q)
Therefore, q = sq.rt(u/s)
Mutation vs. Selection
Given mutation rate of A1-->A2 = 0.0001 with 's' against A2 = 0.1
Q = sq. rt. (0.0001/0.1) = 0.001 0.0316
Example:
Albino (aa): f(a)=qE=0.05, s=1
qE = 0.05 = sq. rt( u/1)
Therefore, u = 0.0025
Example:
Change of p = sq *if p is close to 1
If selection balances mutation, up=sq
!
But, when p is close to 1, up=u
!
So, u=sq and qE= u/s
!
Mutation rate u (A1-->A2) causes the change of p of u*p which
must equal the gain of change in p due to selection
With Incomplete Dominance:
Mutation
Let s1=0, s2=0.9
T = total individuals remaining
Then,
P1 = 1-q1 = 1 -(q0 / (1+q0)) = 1/ (1+q0)
= (1/2*.5*.6*.4) / (1 -.5*.4)
= 0.075
Change in P = (1/2*s*p0*q0)/(1 -s*q0)
Change in P = [pq(s2q -s1p)] / [1-(s1P^2) -(s2q^2)]
*if we reach equilibrium, change in p = 0
SO, pE = s2/(s1+s2) and qE = s1/(s2+s1)
3. Migration, Selection & Mutation
Saturday,*February*4,*2017 1:36*PM
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Three factors that mess up hardy-weinberg equilibrium are migration, selection and mutation which alter allele frequencies. Movement of alleles from one population to the next. If allele frequencies are the same between two populations, migration has no effect. -> population 1 after migration: p1"= mp2 + (1-m)p1 = p1 + m(p2-p1) M is the migration rate = proportion of the total combined number of individuals in the new population 1 that came from population. Wild population of squirrels are all black [f(b)=1, f(b)=0]. A researcher releases grey squirrels [f(b)=0, f(b)=1] that make up 5% of the population. P1" = m(p2-p1) + p1 = 0. 05(0-1) + 1 = 0. 95. Q1= 1- p1" = 1- 0. 95 = 0. 05. Tracking proportion of individuals in combined population by origin: 1p1 = 0p1 (1-m) + mp2 kp1 = k-1p1 (1-m) + mp2. *m is assumed to be constant and the size of the native population is assumed constant as a proportion.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents