PHIL 2030 Lecture Notes - Lecture 17: The Christian Science Journal, Implementation Force, Biomedicine

• School: University of Guelph
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: PHIL 2030
• Professor: Maya Goldenberg

Document Summary

Monday, november 14, 2016 christian science, rational choice, and alternative worldviews. It is possible to see the world in multiple ways, from within multiple paradigms, and that there is not a fair method to see which way is right. Is there no grounds for comparison: bio med paradigm. Focused on healing the body: christian science paradigm. Is there really no common ground between these to. A breakdown of desautels" argu(cid:373)e(cid:374)t fro(cid:373) today"s readi(cid:374)g. The christia(cid:374) (cid:272)ie(cid:374)tist(cid:859)s health-related choice should be viewed as resembling any choice with quantifiable external likelihood of success; therefore the church is at fault for failing to supply the success-rate information needed to (cid:373)ake that (cid:272)hoi(cid:272)e(cid:863) (cid:894)(cid:1007)(cid:1006)(cid:1007)(cid:895). Christian science fails to offer any evidence regarding it(cid:859)s su(cid:272)(cid:272)ess rate: (cid:862)(cid:1006). Christian science fails to offer an explanation of what on their own account constitutes a successful healing method: (cid:862)(cid:1007).