POLS 3140 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Sunday Shopping, Toleration, Pierre Trudeau

19 views4 pages

Document Summary

Week #2: legitimacy and activism debate (unit 2) 11:20 am: case brief - assignment #1 (feb 1st), court: what court it is, facts of the case. Why did this go to court or what happened before the case. Hierarchies of courts (everything that happened up to the court we are examining) - high court decision. Record dissents in the lower courts: decision and action. What did the court answer to #4. (what was the majorities answer to the questions before the court) - what: voting coalitions. Why did the majority of the court answer the questions before the court (#4: signifi(cid:272)ant o(cid:271)iter (cid:894)don"t do(cid:895) - n/a, concurring opinions - n/a, dissenting opinions. Why did the dissent answer the questions before the court: summary. What is the main point and sum the case up. In class questions #1: arguments of charterphiles and charterphobes in 1982, charterphobes: diminish the roles of parliament and take away power from the charter.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents