Class Notes (839,246)
Canada (511,223)
Sociology (717)
SOC 227 (32)
Lecture

Part c- Lecture 1 Social Structure theories: Sociological criminology.pdf

8 Pages
256 Views

Department
Sociology
Course Code
SOC 227
Professor
Addie Nelson

This preview shows pages 1,2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 8 pages of the document.
Description
PART C: SOCIAL STRUCTURE THEORIES: SOCIOLOGICAL CRIMINOLOGY Some criminologists maintain that there should be other causes of crime studied. Study socioeconomic environment should be examined. There are discernable patterns in crime. We have noted that crime does vary by such factors as age sex, social class, and for this reason the criminologists ho focus on theories in next section, maintained that t is impossible to focus on entrenched patters if we used theories that teat crime as an individual level phenomenon. Changes in cultural norms impact group behaviour. If we want to understand crime as a cultural phenomenon, we have to tend to the dynamics and interactions of individuals and important institutions such as family, schools, workplace etc. They also direct attention to the relationships of social groups to one another. They start off that giving the deprivations experienced by lower classes and disadvantage of lower status can be primary source of crime. Three major branches of criminology that focus on impact of social structure: Strain Theory, Cultural deviance theory, disorganization theory. All strain theories can be traced to Durkheim’s concept of Anomie. Anomie theory (Greek - a nomos - “without norms”) Durkheim: term “anomie” used in 2 different ways:  he used the terms in two distinct, non-identical ways. 1. Division of Labour in Society- book anomic society - one in which norms have broken down or become inoperative during times of rapid social change Mechanical to organic solidarity - society assumes an anomic form  forwards theory of crime in social evolution. It examines what occurs in societies during process of modernization or more specifically the changes that occur in a society in the process of transition from one of mechanical solidarity to organic solidarity. These were ideal types, and Durkheim did not believe we can find examples of societies of pure exemplars f one or the other. All societies were at different stages of progression between the two. Mechanical solidarity: characteristic of preindustrial society held together by traditions, shared values, unquestioned beliefs  first and most simple type, this form of solidarity and division of labour is minimal. Mechanical is use in a paradoxical way and implies to refer to the uniformity of consciousness of these societies.- in these societies a single normative system holds. So held together by tradition, shared believes, and unquestioned beliefs. Uniformity of lives, work etc of all members. Law: enforces uniformity of members -orientated towards repressing deviation -uniformity in mechanical society: “collective conscience” second term used and refers to all types of uniformity. No mysteries and everyone knows and accepts the rules. No matter how homogenous a society is in beliefs and successful socialization of people to accept these, there will always be many possible differences that exist among members. Societies can not be formed or continue to exist if individuals had to continuously make sacrifices of their identity. So like Baccaria, Durkheim accepts that humans are an abyss of desires, and we will always want to have more than what we possess. “Malady of infinite aspiration”- Despotic personality punishment of criminals - plays role in maintenance of social solidarity collective conscience would help quell this infinite aspiration, however, more rigorous measures would be needed at times and the strongest form of pressure that society can exert in attempt to ensure conformity is when people are labelled as criminals and sanctioned. Criminals are extremely important to society, and that crime should be thought of as functional- according to Durkheim, when we identify a person as criminal and punish them, the rest of society who has obeyed collective conscience are explicitly encouraged to think of themselves as superior to criminal and to revel in it. This sense of superiority to criminals, and feelings of us being more good, admirable is the social source of solidarity in mechanical societies and therefore that is why crime is functional.  when criminal is punished with repressive sanctions, the primary goal is not retribution, nor deterrence, but the reason why society responds with repressive sanctions, is that if they did not, the rest of the law-abiding society would feel totally demoralized.  eg. Student that did not write exam on exam date and asked around about questions receives a 98% while the person writing on the date got 62%. The good person would feel resentment etc, but if the bad person was asked for paperwork and could not do so and received a punishment, the good person may feel good and hope in society and law again. Yet -society without a crime is impossible (constraints of the collective conscience too rigid)  even if we had a city of angels we would still have activities set out as criminal and some as not. In order to ensure that those that obey rules would feel the social piety.  in addition, he was adamant about a society with crime and no crime was impossible due to the existence of diverse people. If we had a society with no crime then it would be a society that was dysfunctional- because the restraints of the collective conscious would be so rigid and oppressive that we would have a pathological situation. We would also be eradicating the possibility of progressive social change. Social change is brought in by those who challenge the status quo. Those who oppose the constraints of the collective conscience. During time of Socrates, Jesus, Mahatma Ghandi, Martin Luther etc were labelled as criminals. Crime is the price a society pays for the possibility of progress.  mother in law and grandson in grocery store example- if child never misbehaved then the child would be pathological and so controlled with no independence and end up with a clone of yourself. There should be opportunity for rebel behaviour. To eliminate possibility of crime, would eliminate possibility for social change. Organic solidarity  Different pattern of interaction going on. The different segments of society depend on one another in highly organized division of labour. People rely on each other not on beliefs etc, but instead on interdependent needs. The products and services those in society produce. According to Durkheim if society is characterised by this and there is moral diversity, there would be mediating institutions to ensure social cohesion.  The primary source of this control would be occupational groups which would ensure moral regulation. And push to conformity. e.g., postindustrial society - division of labour; connected by interdependent needs for each others’ services/production Law: regulates society/functional law Anomie =pathological state of the economy -constant property of industrial society -theory of crime set in the context of an overall theory of modernization  according to him in the book Anomie is a disease that affects men and women that arises in process of modernization and primarily occurs because of sources of social control in mechanical solidarity are less potent and effective in societies of Organic solidarity, in consequence Anomie becomes a constant.  We saw religion losing some influence over behaviour of individuals, and a shift in government policies and saw lez effair in non interference of government in business matters, guilt no longer an influence. The lack of unifying set of rules, what was formerly kept at bay (Anomie) became common feature of industrial life.  As societies made the transition to Organic Societies, are the prediction that the society would see greater toleration of behaviours and variety of behaviours from earlier times. Also, predicted there would be expansion of functional law- administrative codes for day to day interactions and trade ( highway traffic act- wouldn’t be called immoral if broke law)). There would be change in purpose of punishment from that of oppressing deviance to restitution. Finally, crime rates would increase, due to the less clear cut rules, rules more fluid, norms became less a part of entrenched believes or collective conscience.  If the ideal amount of social regulation to curb these malady of aspirations then social maladies would occur and one of those would be crime. – Anomie- state of inadequate regulations. Anomie occurs through changes of modernization and finally that Anomie is constant feature of industrial society. 2. Suicide- Book anomie: pathological mental state of individual who is insufficiently regulated by society “malady of infinite aspirations” e.g., weariness, disillusionment, agitation, anger, “infinite disgust with life”  Anomie is not a product of industrialized society but of individual mental state. In times of popular war there is a rise in collective sentiments and patriotism and a decrease in suicide. The reason is because during the period of such crisis, the rules are enunciated differently then in normal times. A pulling together and defining us vs them and throwing around labels. Allows for conformity and regulation. “Strain Theories” Variants Robert Merton: modified version of concept of anomie to fit social/economic/cultural conditions found in modern U.S. society Durkheim: anomie - breakdown in the ability of society to regulate appetites Merton: appetites culturally induced  some people revered and seen as more deserving of rewards. Inequality is normalized. Hereditary privledge system was major in Europe and America was seen as an open society which implied that all enjoyed opportunity to succeed. Therefore, immigrants came to America. “American dream” Durkheim: culture - functioned to limit the aspirations of individuals Merton: culture: American Dream- money and success was available equally to all.  Merton did not believe that humans were not naturally of wanting more, but he believed our American dream rather than suppressing appetites, but worked to feed and grow appetite by suggesting we can flourish in America limitlessly. Merton: anomie: lack of symmetry between the culture (the American Dream) and social Structure- Anomie was built in society because it could not lead to limitless opportunities to all and only minority would ever enj
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1,2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit