Class Notes (889,384)
CA (531,995)
UBC (12,637)
PHIL (220)
PHIL 102 (33)
Lecture

April 3.pdf

2 Pages
85 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHIL 102
Professor
Dominic Mc Iver Lopes

This preview shows 80% of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
final exam: should take about an hr/hr and half -all short answer (one sentence) -ask what you know and to complete arguments -study for recall, not recognition -try rewriting notes into less pages-eg. 30 into 20, then 10, then 5, then 1 -look at number of points the question is worth -value theory -questions/problems -theories ▯ -example q: what is a theory? an answer to a ‘what is’ question -concepts -arguments -theories are often tested by considering counterexamples ▯ -there are two kinds: an example that fits the criteria but isn’t the same result, or ▯ getting the result without the criteria ▯ -eg. theory of romantic love: S loves R iff S values R for their intrinsic humanity ▯ -counterexample: you love your baby for its intrinsic humanity, but its not ▯ romantic love ▯ -counterexample two: do you really have to value someone for their intrinsic ▯ humanity in order to love them? -deductive arguments -abductive arguments: arguments to the best explanation (will have facts then explanations) ▯ -lucretius argument for death: 1. death is nonexistence ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ 2. nobody exists prenatally . 3 ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ 4. so nonexistence harms nobody ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯ ▯
More Less
Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Only 80% of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document
Subscribers Only

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit