PSYC 3210U Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Youth Criminal Justice Act, Young Offenders Act, Juvenile Delinquency

38 views10 pages
School
Department
Professor
UNIT 11 NOTES
Young Offenders
Current and Historical Treatment of Young Offenders in Canada
Early Young Offender Legislation
17th/18th Centuries
No formal rules regarding treatment of adolescents
Charges, sentencing and incarceration were as with adults
: The Juvenile Delinuents’ Act JDA
Applied to children between the ages of 7-16 (18 in some jurisdictions)
Separate, somewhat more informal, court system was established
Sentencing options were expanded to include less formal options
Parents were encouraged to be a part of the proceedings
Young Offenders Act (YOA)
Replaced the JDA in 1984
Represented a shift in how adolescent offenders were perceived
While younger, were still viewed as an equal threat to society
Were thus:
afforded all rights stated in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
to be held fully responsible for their actions
Youth falling under the act were between the ages of 12-18
Under 12, were handled through child and family services
Young Offenders Act (YOA) cont.
Some differences between adults and youth were still recognized (e.g. cognitive
development)
These differences were addressed through differential levels of accountability, and
differential consequences for their actions
Diversion was possible: to have the adolescent undergo educational or community
service instead of formal prosecution
Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA)
Replaced the YOA in 2003, and remains active today
The three main objectives of the YCJA are:
To prevent youth crime
To provide meaningful consequences and encourage responsibility of behavior
To improve rehabilitation and reintegration of youth into the community
There is a push for extrajudicial measures
Measures taken to keep youth out of court/custody if possible
Youth Criminal Justice Act cont.
Youth must remain anonymous, except under special circumstances
Sentencing options have increased
Transfer to adult court has been eliminated
However, adult charges can still be requested, and applied at times
Victims are given the opportunity to participate in the process
Practice Question #1
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) replaced the Young Offenders Act (YOA) in 2003. Which of
the following is not a main objective of the YCJA.
Answer: to increase the extent to which prison sentences feel punitive.
Youth Crime Rates
Youth crime has been decreasing since 2001
Assessment of Young Offenders
Assessment Procedures
Often assessment of youth is mandated by the courts
For the purpose of determining reoffending risk
In other cases, youth may be assessed voluntarily
Assent gathered from parents
Often to determine mental stability
Offense history is often limited
Context may play a greater role in offending
Thus, unlike adults, history is often not a major risk consideration
Risk Assessment
Generally mandated by the court
Assesset istruet geerall etails a heklist or risk-relevant characteristics
Eg. age at first arrests, antisocial attitudes
Generally assumed: more risk factors = higher reoffending risk
Example assessment instruments:
HCR-20
ORAMS
Mental Health Assessment
Often undertaken with assent/consent
Intends to evaluate the mental health of the adolescent
Internalizing problems: emotional difficulties including anxiety, depression and
obsessions
Externalizing problems: behavioral difficulties including delinquency, fighting,
bullying and lying
Externalizing problems are often considered to impart greater risk for
reoffending
Behavior Disorders in Youth
The Ontario Child Health Study (1987):
18% of children between 4-16 experienced conduct disorder, hyperactivity
and/or emotional disturbance
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
A patter of egatiisti, hostile, ad defiat ehaior APA, 994
Conduct Disorder
Initiates fights, cruel to animals, sets fires, lies, truancy
40% with ODD develop CD; 50% with CD develop ASPD
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Trajectories of Youthful Offenders
Adolescent-limited (AL)
Crime increases drastically in adolescence
Tends to dissipate in late 20s/early 30s
Ma relate to a oral aout of adoleset isehaig
Life-course Persistent (LCP)
Crime remains stable through the life-course
Crime does not increase in adolescence
Suggests more stable personality characteristics
Note that crime also tends to start earlier for LCPs
Practice Question #2
Which of the following is true about Adolescent-Limited and Life-course Persistent patterns of
antisociality?
Answer: adolescent-liited atisoialit a relate to oral adoleset isehaig.
Theories of Youthful Offending
Personality-based Theories
Personality: stable patterns of behavior, thoughts or actions that distinguish one person
from another.
Thus, personality theories presume that characteristics about the individual may
predispose to antisociality
Personality-based Theories
Personality: stable patterns of behavior, thoughts or actions that distinguish one person
from another.
Thus, personality theories presume that characteristics about the individual may
predispose to antisociality
Big-five Pesonality Chaacteistics
Extraversion
Neuroticism
Conscientiousness Very Low
Agreeableness Very Low
Openness
Personality Applied to Youth Offenders: Callous/Unemotional Traits
Paul Frick and colleagues:
Have identified a cluster of personality characteristics which may identify youth
ith allous/ueotioal traits
Increased reward orientation / decreased punishment sensitivity
These children:
Show more conduct problems in adolescence (Frick et al., 2003)
Show more criminal problems as adults (McMahon, Witkiewitz & Kotler,
2010)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Current and historical treatment of young offenders in canada. The youth criminal justice act (ycja) replaced the young offenders act (yoa) in 2003. Which of the following is not a main objective of the ycja. Answer: to increase the extent to which prison sentences feel punitive. Youth crime rates: youth crime has been decreasing since 2001. Assessment procedures: often assessment of youth is mandated by the courts, for the purpose of determining reoffending risk. Risk assessment: generally mandated by the court, assess(cid:373)e(cid:374)t i(cid:374)stru(cid:373)e(cid:374)t ge(cid:374)erall(cid:455) e(cid:374)tails a (cid:862)(cid:272)he(cid:272)klist(cid:863) or risk-relevant characteristics, eg. age at first arrests, antisocial attitudes, generally assumed: more risk factors = higher reoffending risk, example assessment instruments, hcr-20, orams. Mental health assessment: often undertaken with assent/consent. Intends to evaluate the mental health of the adolescent. Internalizing problems: emotional difficulties including anxiety, depression and obsessions: externalizing problems: behavioral difficulties including delinquency, fighting, bullying and lying, externalizing problems are often considered to impart greater risk for reoffending.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents