Class Notes (839,092)
Canada (511,185)
Criminology (2,493)
CRM3312 (86)
Lecture 13

Lecture 13-.docx

5 Pages
112 Views

Department
Criminology
Course Code
CRM3312
Professor
Kenneth Campbell

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
Sentencing under the Youth Criminal Justice Act Under JDA • Created a separate system for responding to youth who commit crimes • Provided guidance and assistance o not necessarily on rights • Courses of action – not very many • Youth sentence could be altered at any time • Welfare oriented law – broad definition of delinquency • Sentencing decisions in the “best interests” of the youth o rather subjective • Law meant to “correct” and “treat” youth o not necessarily punish • Youth could be under jurisdiction until 21 years • Assumption that courts act solely in the interests of the youth o but don’t always • Legal appeals were restricted – only if special grounds were considered o judge would have to decided if there was special grounds, no automatic right to appeal • Sentences under the JDA did not reflect the seriousness of the offence o kids in same facility, one committed murder and one where parents couldn’t control him • Problematic means of sentencing – indeterminate sentence, no right to appeal, proportionality not relevant here Rehabilitation as a Sentencing Objective • Based on idea that courts can identify the rehabilitative needs f youth and that successful rehabilitative programs are available o odds are against rehabilitation, most don’t think they have a problem, don’t want your help • Difficult to sentence minor offender based on rehabilitative needs • May lead to youth who have committed similar offences getting different sentences The YOA • Created fundamental changes in sentencing • Sentences became “dispositions” and definitive in length (2-3 years max) • No parole or statutory release – 18 months means 18 months • Declaration of Principle (sec.3) has a few provisions related to sentencing o special needs, rehabilitation, parents were part of process • Welfare considerations still relevant, as was rehabilitation • Nature of offence should be taken into account o new and important part, not just based on needs now st nd • Murder sentencing: 10 years (1 ), 7 years (2 degree) o longest determinate sentence for youth up to date • Custody was not a substitute for child welfare concerns o even if legitimate reason • Following enactment of the YOA o sentences increased o custodial sentences more closely linked to the offence • More youth were being sentenced to shorter sentences • Number/proportion of long sentences decreased o had long histories by the time they get prison Identifying Problems with Sentencing under the YOA • Problems led to YCJA • Canada had a high rate of imprisonment of youth when compared to other countries o even if based on nature of offence, we have more kids coming in system • Canada does not differentiate adequately between serious violent and other offences • Response of the justice system did not reflect adequately the variability in severity of offences o now there’s clear distinctions on who gets custody • Increased custodial sentences for relatively minor offences • Quebec uses custody less and more selectively than other provinces o Alberta as well, a lot of disparity • Substantial evidence of sentencing disparity • Ontario used custody in 40% of cases, whereas Quebec did in 27-28% of cases • Public believed that sentences under the YOA were too lenient o media created myths by showing only the bad crimes who got shorter sentences The YCJA • YCJA intended to: o reduce the numbers of youth in custody  costs less and inhumane o Ensure that sentences reflected the seriousness of the offence  new • Contains more explicit sentencing principles • Limits when custody can be used o cases where there is violence • Protection of the public is seen as a consequence of certain approaches to crime • Youth system is designed to: o prevent crime by addressing underlying circumstances o rehabilitate young offenders o ensure youth are subject to meaningful consequences to promote societal protection • Sentence should not be harsher than would be appropriate for a comparable adult • Sentence should be proportionate to the offence and degree of responsibility • Judge must consider all non-custodial sanctions prior to considering custody o last resort • Sentence must rehabilitate, reintegrate, promote responsibility, be least restrictive • Judge must consider rehabilitation, within the limits governed by proportionately • Proportionality refers to the relative harshness of sentence in relation to offence • Restricts custody to cases where: o if it is a violent offence o youth failed to comply with 2 non-custodial orders o youth has committed has committed an indictable offence or there are special
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit