PHI 1101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Ad Hominem, Ignoratio Elenchi, Straw Man

95 views1 pages
Chapter 6
Relevance fallacies - arguments that may seem relevant to their conclusion but logically are not !
Argumentum ad hominem - attempting to dismiss a sourceā€™s position by discussing the source
rather than the position !
Straw man - attempting to dismiss a sourceā€™s position by misinterpreting it !
False dilemma - attempting to establish a point by pretending it is the only alternative to
something we will ļ¬nd unacceptable, unattainable, or implausible !
Misplacing the burden of proof - attempting to place the burden of proof on the wrong side of
an issue !
Begging the question - attempting to ā€œsupportā€ a contention by oļ¬€ering as ā€œevidenceā€ what
amounts to a repackaging of the very contention in question !
Appeal to emotions - attempting to ā€œsupportā€ a contention by playing on our emotions rather
than by producing a real argument !
Irrelevant conclusion - relevance fallacies that do not ļ¬t into the previous categories !
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 1 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
ngrosie3 and 39926 others unlocked
PHI 1101 Full Course Notes
22
PHI 1101 Full Course Notes
Verified Note
22 documents

Document Summary

Relevance fallacies - arguments that may seem relevant to their conclusion but logically are not. Argumentum ad hominem - attempting to dismiss a source"s position by discussing the source rather than the position. Straw man - attempting to dismiss a source"s position by misinterpreting it. False dilemma - attempting to establish a point by pretending it is the only alternative to something we will nd unacceptable, unattainable, or implausible. Misplacing the burden of proof - attempting to place the burden of proof on the wrong side of an issue. Begging the question - attempting to support a contention by o ering as evidence what amounts to a repackaging of the very contention in question. Appeal to emotions - attempting to support a contention by playing on our emotions rather than by producing a real argument.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related textbook solutions

Related Documents