Class Notes (996,734)
CA (574,795)
UTM (26,346)
PSY (4,446)
PSY230H5 (157)
d (24)
Lecture

PSY230H5 Lecture Notes - Stereotype Threat, Gender Role

2 pages66 viewsWinter 2012

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSY230H5
Professor
d

This preview shows half of the first page. to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Lecture#23
Social Psychology (Part II)
ŸConsequences of prejudice from the point of view of the target of prejudice, in specific, stereotype
threat
ŸBy prejudice we are referring to a kind of attitude, a particular kind of evaluation, a negative one of a
group of people, who are defined by membership of same characteristics, race, ethnicity, occupational
status, age, sexual orientation, etc. (demographic characteristic)
ŸAn evaluation of the group as a whole
ŸA significant component of a prejudice is a stereotype, an over generalized and false belief, no
exceptions
ŸPrejudice and stereotypes are things that we have, when we act on them, we are speaking on
discrimination; discrimination is something that we do, explicitly behaviour
ŸPrejudice is an attitude, discrimination is a belief, and discrimination is a behaviour
ŸTo discriminate is to treat people different based on their group membership, most common forms are
limiting access to resources, denying opportunities such as jobs, economic opportunities
ŸWhere do our prejudices come from? Many sources of prejudices, but one commonly sited and studied
from a classic study is the Sherif Camp Study, kids were isolated in a camp and randomly assigned to
two different cabins which were isolated from each other, the cabins had characteristics that
represented two different things, rattlers and eagles, and participated in different activities as a group
ŸCompetitive interactions between two groups, and within a very short period of time, there was an
escalating extent of verbal and physical aggression, kids would tease each other, and eventually
escalated to camp invasions, destroy/remove property, etc., emerged spontaneously
ŸEach group wanted to elevate their status within their group
ŸConclusion was that competition cultivated a kind of out group denigration, condemned members of
out groups
ŸThrough the course of evolution, this might have had an adaptive value, in earlier points of history
when we were in tribal bands, this kind of ability may have been of benefit (favour people from one’s
own group from another)
ŸConsequences of these actions, prejudice, are stereotype threats, a particular kind of discomfort or
distress, when they are representing their group on some kind of performance related activity
ŸImagine a member of a group that is under discrimination, and they are seen weaker in some kind of
ability, and now you must perform it, the theory goes, this additional burden that you are aware that
you are bad at this ability, and you have to perform as good as everyone else and better than what
others expect, and these kinds of cognitions, confirms the stereotype that people have of you due to the
stress
Ÿe.g. study of women who were asked to do a math test, and prior to taking it, they were told there were
gender differences on the test, it was left for the women to assume that women did more poorly, and
under this condition, it was compromised, and by just being told that women did poorly, the drop in
performance was obtained (they simply affirmed and confirmed the stereotype, that math is hard for
women)
ŸTeen talking Barbie doll, the doll uttered ‘math is hard’, which caused much controversy
ŸThis didn’t happen in the 50s or 70s, but in 1992, pervasive and persistent beliefs, in our generation
ŸCan the fact that people in fact believe this in women, actually play a role in math related domains?
ŸIt is of interest to note that in the domains for math, science, and engineering, women are under
represented, just in undergraduate classrooms as of 1996,1997, women made up 1/3 of these programs
(overwhelming male predominant field)
ŸWhat is it that makes your gender salient? What brings your gender to mind? Just by simply looking
around their classroom and seeing a smaller attendance of women discourages them, makes your
gender salient, and play a role in compromising your role in that context
ŸIs a situational cue, like gender composition, relative number of men vs. women, enough to create a
threatening stereotypical climate, where stereotypes are in your mind, conscious or not
ŸStudy of women, one group took a standardized math test, and two groups that had no gender
stereotpye salient, a verbal test
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version


Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.